Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Nagpur v. Megha Prakash Chaudhari
[Citation -2019-LL-1016-48]

Citation 2019-LL-1016-48
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Nagpur
Respondent Name Megha Prakash Chaudhari
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 16/10/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: P.C:- In all these Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant- Revenue, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. 2 This for the reason that the tax effect in all these appeals is less than the threshold limit as provided in CBDT Circular No.17 dated 8 th August, 2019. 3 In view of the above, all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed.


itxa-3122-2018-group IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3122 OF 2018 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.3126, 3131, 3171, 3263, 3267, 3269 3234 , 3238 & (L) 2063 OF 2018 Mr. Sham Walve, for Appellant in ITXA Nos.3122, 3126, 3131, 3171, 3263, 3267 & 3269 of 2018 & 3234, 3238 of 2018 Mr. Tejveer Singh, for Appellant in ITXA (L)No.2063 of 2018. CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2019. P.C:- In all these Appeals under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), learned Counsel appearing for Appellant- Revenue, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. 2 This for reason that tax effect in all these appeals is less than threshold limit as provided in CBDT Circular No.17 dated 8 th August, 2019 . 3 In view of above, all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed. 4 Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) S.R.JOSHI 1 of 1 ::: Uploaded on - 18/10/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 22/10/2019 14:46:42 ::: Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Nagpur v. Megha Prakash Chaudhari
Report Error