The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. The Income-tax Appellate Authority (The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram / Income Tax Officer, Ward No.4, Kollam
[Citation -2019-LL-1016-36]

Citation 2019-LL-1016-36
Appellant Name The Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited
Respondent Name The Income-tax Appellate Authority (The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram / Income Tax Officer, Ward No.4, Kollam
Court HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 16/10/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15, 2016-17
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags stay petition • demand notice
Bot Summary: No.27437/2019 : 2 : JUDGMENT Against Exts.P2 and P3 assessment orders under the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17, the petitioner has preferred appeals before the First Appellate Authority, but the same were dismissed by Exts.P4 and P5 orders. Immediately thereafter, Ext.P6 demand notice was served on the petitioner for recovery of the amounts confirmed against the petitioner by the Appellate Authority. The limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to refrain from pursuing recovery steps till such time as the petitioner prefers an appeal and stay petition before the Appellate Tribunal as permitted by the Statute. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct that if the petitioner prefers an appeal along with a stay petition before the W.P.(C). No.27437/2019 : 3 : Appellate Tribunal within one month from today, then the Appellate Tribunal shall proceed to consider the stay application preferred by the petitioner within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of the application from the petitioner. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not file the appeal and stay petition within the time granted in this judgment, he will lose the benefit of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the respondents and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, for further action.


IN HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019/24TH ASWINA, 1941 W.P(C).No.27437 OF 2019(D) PETITIONER: MAYYANAD REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED MAYYANAD BANK BUILDING, MAYYANAD, KOLLAM-691303, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE BY ADVS.SRI.V.JAYAPRADEEP SMT.ANN SUSAN GEORGE SMT.O.A.NURIYA SRI.D.S.LOKANATHAN SRI.ALAN PRIYADARSHI DEV RESPONDENTS: 1 INCOME TAX APPELLATE AUTHORITY (THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003 2 INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.4 RAILWAY STATION ROAD, KARABALA JUNCTION, KOLLAM-691001 BY SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, SC, IT DEPARTMENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16.10.2019, COURT ON SAME DAY DELIVERED FOLLOWING: W.P.(C).No.27437/2019 : 2 : JUDGMENT Against Exts.P2 and P3 assessment orders under Income Tax Act, for assessment years 2014-15 and 2016-17, petitioner has preferred appeals before First Appellate Authority, but same were dismissed by Exts.P4 and P5 orders. Immediately thereafter, Ext.P6 demand notice was served on petitioner for recovery of amounts confirmed against petitioner by Appellate Authority. limited prayer of petitioner is for direction to respondents to refrain from pursuing recovery steps till such time as petitioner prefers appeal and stay petition before Appellate Tribunal as permitted by Statute. 2. I have heard learned counsel for petitioner as also learned Standing counsel for respondents. On consideration of facts and circumstances of case as also submissions made across bar, I direct that if petitioner prefers appeal along with stay petition before W.P.(C).No.27437/2019 : 3 : Appellate Tribunal within one month from today, then Appellate Tribunal shall proceed to consider stay application preferred by petitioner within further period of two months from date of receipt of application from petitioner. I make it clear that recovery steps, pursuant to Ext.P6 demand notice, shall be kept in abeyance till such time as Appellate Tribunal considers and passes orders on stay petition to be preferred by petitioner and said order is communicated to petitioner. It is made clear that if petitioner does not file appeal and stay petition within time granted in this judgment, he will lose benefit of this judgment. petitioner shall produce copy of writ petition together with copy of this judgment, before respondents and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, for further action. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp/15/10/19 W.P.(C).No.27437/2019 : 4 : APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXT.P1: COPY OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY REGISTRAR, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES DATED 12.02.1957. EXT.P2: COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 29.12.2016 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. EXT.P3: COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD. 26.12.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17. EXT.P4: COPY OF APPEAL ORDER DATED 05.09.2019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014- 15. EXT.P5: COPY OF APPEAL ORDER DATED 05.09.2019 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17. EXT.P6: COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DTD. 01.10.2019. EXT.P7: COPY OF ORDER OF INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL DATED 03.09.2018 IN ITA NO.98/COCH/2017. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL. //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mayyanad Regional Co-Operative Bank Limited v. Income-tax Appellate Authority (The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Thiruvananthapuram / Income Tax Officer, Ward No.4, Kollam
Report Error