Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Limited v. ACIT, Circle-10, Pune
[Citation -2019-LL-1001-41]

Citation 2019-LL-1001-41
Appellant Name Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Limited
Respondent Name ACIT, Circle-10, Pune
Court ITAT-Pune
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 01/10/2019
Assessment Year 2004-05
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags levy of penalty • disallowance of commission expenditure
Bot Summary: Counsel brought our attention to the order of the Tribunal on merits vide ITA No.402/PUN/2013 2 ITA No.2052/PUN/2017 along with C.O. No.22/PUN2014 and others dated 05.09.2019 and submitted that the contents of para 16 and its sub-paragraphs are relevant. Referring to the said para 16 of the order of the Tribunal, ld. For the sake of completeness, the relevant lines of sub-para 16.3 of the order of the Tribunal are extracted hereunder :- 16.3 The reasons for disallowing commission is purely on surmises and conjectures. DR for the Revenue relied heavily on the orders of the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A). We heard both the sides and perused the orders of the revenue authorities and also the order of the Tribunal on merits. From the above extracted lines of the order of the Tribunal, it is evident that the disallowance of Rs.66,25,000/-, the commission payment made to couple of companies, are found eventually allowable by the Tribunal. Considering the relief granted to the assessee on merits by the Tribunal, we are of the opinion that the penalty order has no legs to stand.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM .ITA No.2052/PUN/2017 Assessment Year 2004-05 Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Limited, 14, Mumbai Pune Road, Wakdewadi, Pune-411003. PAN AAACT3908K Appellant V/s. ACIT, Circle-10, Pune. Respondent Assessee by Shri Sanjay Bhare Revenue by Shri Pankaj Garg Date of Hearing 30.09.2019 Date of Pronouncement 01.10.2019 ORDER PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM This appeal is filed by assessee against order of CIT(A)-6, Pune dated 22.05.2017 for Assessment Year 2004-05. 2. solitary issue raised in appeal relates to penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Act in connection with disallowance of Rs.66,25,000/-. 3. Before us, at outset, ld. Counsel for assessee submitted that penalty was levied in connection with disallowance of commission payments amounting to Rs.66,25,000/-. In this regard, ld. Counsel brought our attention to order of Tribunal on merits vide ITA No.402/PUN/2013 2 ITA No.2052/PUN/2017 along with C.O. No.22/PUN2014 and others dated 05.09.2019 and submitted that contents of para 16 and its sub-paragraphs are relevant. Referring to said para 16 of order of Tribunal (supra), ld. Counsel submitted that payments, made i.e. Rs.36,25,000/- to AyokiFabricon Pvt. Ltd., Pune and Rs.30,00,000/- to M/s New Bombay Ispat Udyog, Mumbai, are found allowable at end of proceedings before Tribunal. For sake of completeness, relevant lines of sub-para 16.3 of order of Tribunal (supra) are extracted hereunder :- 16.3 reasons for disallowing commission is purely on surmises and conjectures. findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on this issue are erroneous and hence, liable to be rejected. We hold and direct accordingly. payment of commission to M/s. Ayoki Fabrication Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. New Bombay Ispat Udyog Ltd. is allowed. Thus, ground No.3 of cross objections filed by assessee is allowed. 4. On other hand, ld. DR for Revenue relied heavily on orders of Assessing Officer and CIT(A). 5. We heard both sides and perused orders of revenue authorities and also order of Tribunal (supra) on merits. From above extracted lines of order of Tribunal (supra), it is evident that disallowance of Rs.66,25,000/-, commission payment made to couple of companies (supra), are found eventually allowable by Tribunal. Considering relief granted to assessee on merits by Tribunal, we are of opinion that penalty order has no legs to stand. penalty is 3 ITA No.2052/PUN/2017 unsustainable in law. Accordingly, grounds raised by assessee are allowed. 6. In result, appeal of assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on 01st day of October, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (D. KARUNAKARA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Pune Dated 01st October, 2019 Sujeet Copy of Order forwarded to 1. Appellant. 2. Respondent. 3. CIT(A)-6, Pune. 4. Pr. CIT-5, Pune. 5. DR, ITAT, B Bench, Pune. 6. Guard File. BY ORDER, Senior Private Secretary ITAT, Pune. Thermax Babcock & Wilcox Limited v. ACIT, Circle-10, Pune
Report Error