The Salem Urban Co-op.Bank Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle- 1, Salem
[Citation -2019-LL-1001-106]

Citation 2019-LL-1001-106
Appellant Name The Salem Urban Co-op.Bank Ltd.
Respondent Name The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle- 1, Salem
Court ITAT-Chennai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 01/10/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags disallowance of deduction • books of accounts • profit and loss account
Bot Summary: Shri S. Sridhar, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that the Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the ground that the provision was not made in the books of account. Referring to the Profit Loss account, the Ld.counsel submitted that a provision was made to the extent of 8,70,000/- in the books of account for the year ending 31.03.2014. The assessee has filed a copy of Profit Loss account for the financial year 2013-14 relevant to the assessment year under consideration and submitted that the matter may be remitted back to the file of the Assessing Officer for reconsideration. The copy of Profit Loss account filed before this Tribunal indicates that a provision was made to the extent of 8,70,000/-. The assessee claims that even though the copy of Profit Loss account was filed before the Assessing Officer as well as the CIT(Appeals), they have not considered the same. The Assessing Officer shall re-examine the matter in the light of the material that was filed by the assessee and bring on record whether any provision was made in the books of account as claimed by the assessee and thereafter decide the issue afresh in accordance with law, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the assessee. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.


,, IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH, CHENNAI BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ITA No.1984/Chny/2019 (Assessment Year : 2014-15 Salem Urban Co-op.Bank Assistant Commissioner of Ltd., v. Income Tax, 435, First Agraharam, Circle 1, Salem 636001. No.3, Gandhi Road, Salem 7. PAN : AABAT 9761 B (Appellant) (Respondent) , //Appellant by : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate //Respondent by : Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCIT //Date of Hearing : 12.09.2019 //Date of Pronouncement : 01.10.2019 ORDER PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of assessee is directed against order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Salem, dated 26.04.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2014-15. 2. Shri S. Sridhar, Ld.counsel for assessee, submitted that Assessing Officer disallowed claim of assessee under Section 36(1)(viia) of Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the 2 I.T.A. No.1984/Chny/19 Act') on ground that provision was not made in books of account. Referring to Profit & Loss account, Ld.counsel submitted that provision was made to extent of 8,70,000/- in books of account for year ending 31.03.2014. This was specifically brought to notice of CIT(Appeals). According to Ld. counsel, CIT(Appeals) without considering same has confirmed order of Assessing Officer. assessee has filed copy of Profit & Loss account for financial year 2013-14 relevant to assessment year under consideration and submitted that matter may be remitted back to file of Assessing Officer for reconsideration. 3. We heard Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Ld. Departmental Representative also. copy of Profit & Loss account filed before this Tribunal indicates that provision was made to extent of 8,70,000/-. assessee claims that even though copy of Profit & Loss account was filed before Assessing Officer as well as CIT(Appeals), they have not considered same. This Tribunal is of considered opinion that when assessee made provision in books of account and produced Profit & Loss account before Assessing Officer as well as CIT(Appeals), 3 I.T.A. No.1984/Chny/19 same cannot be ignored by authorities below. Both authorities below are bound to examine same and find out whether such provision was made in books of account or not, as claimed by assessee. Therefore, this Tribunal is unable to uphold orders of lower authorities. Accordingly, orders of both authorities below are set aside and issue of disallowance made under Section 36(1)(viia) of Act is remitted back to file of Assessing Officer. Assessing Officer shall re-examine matter in light of material that was filed by assessee and bring on record whether any provision was made in books of account as claimed by assessee and thereafter decide issue afresh in accordance with law, after giving reasonable opportunity to assessee. 4. In result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in court on 1st October, 2019 at Chennai. sd/- sd/- (Inturi Rama Rao) (N.R.S. Ganesan) Accountant Member Judicial Member Chennai, st 6 Dated, 1 October, 2019. Kri. 4 I.T.A. No.1984/Chny/19 - 7 8 9 8 Copy to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. : CIT(A), Salem 4. CIT, Salem 5. 8 DR 6. (GF. Salem Urban Co-op.Bank Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle- 1, Salem
Report Error