Kollam District Postal Telcom BSNL Employee's Co-Operative Society Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer Ward-1, Kollam Range, Kollam / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Trivandrum / The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Trivandrum
[Citation -2019-LL-0927-87]
Citation | 2019-LL-0927-87 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Kollam District Postal Telcom BSNL Employee's Co-Operative Society Ltd. |
Respondent Name | Income-tax Officer Ward-1, Kollam Range, Kollam / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-1, Trivandrum / The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, Trivandrum |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 27/09/2019 |
Assessment Year | 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | conditional stay • stay of demand • stay of recovery |
Bot Summary: | No.20467 OF 2019(G) 2 JUDGMENT Against Exts.P1 to P5 assessment orders under the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2012-2013 to 2016-2017, the petitioner has preferred Exts.P7 to P11 appeals before the 2 nd respondent. In the stay application preferred along with the appeals, the 2 nd respondent directed a payment of 20 of the total demand as a condition for stay of the balance amount pending disposal of the appeals. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the assessment pertains to the dis -allowance of deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as also the learned Standing counsel appearing for the WP(C). On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the Bar and taking note of the judgment of Full Bench of this Court as also the Division Bench judgment referred to by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to quash Ext.P17 order, and direct the 2 nd respondent to consider and pass reasoned orders on Exts.P7 to P11 appeals within an outer time limit of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. It is made clear that till such time as orders are passed by the 2 nd respondent as directed, and the orders communicated to the petitioner, recovery steps for recovery of amounts confirmed against the petitioner by Exts.P1 to P5 assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition together with a copy of this judgment, before the 2nd respondent, for further action. |