OOCL Logistics (India) Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-7(1), Mumbai
[Citation -2019-LL-0926-86]

Citation 2019-LL-0926-86
Appellant Name OOCL Logistics (India) Private Limited
Respondent Name The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-7(1), Mumbai
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 26/09/2019
Assessment Year 2009-10
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags grant of interest • grant of refund • quantum appeal • tax liability • excess tax • application for rectification • mistake apparent from record
Bot Summary: Ground 1- Grant of refund It is prayed that the learned AO be directed to refund INR 46,16,231 inclusive of interest under section 244A of the Act computed in the intimation passed under section 143 of the Act which is in the nature of amount paid in excess over the tax liability duly determined by the AO since the same does not 2 ITA No. 4265/ MUM/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 partake the nature of income tax and is refundable to the Appellant along with applicable interest under the Act. Ground 3- Non-receipt of refund by the Company The learned AO erred in determining the refund amounting to INR 7,350 in the assessment order passed under section 143 of the Act and not considering that the refund of INR 46,16,231 determined to be refundable under section 143 of the Act, shown as refunded to the Appellant had never been refunded nor has the same been adjusted against demand of any other Assessment Year(s). Ground 4- Short grant of interest under section 244A of the Act The appellant prays that the AO be directed to grant interest under section 244A of the Act by considering the period for which refund has not been actually refunded. At the outset, the Ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the present appeal has become academic and does not require adjudication on merits in view of the fact that the ITAT has allowed the assessee s appeal ITA No. 6028/Mum/2016 against the order dated 08.07.2016 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) in quantum appeal, vide which the Tribunal has directed the AO to re- 3 ITA No. 4265/ MUM/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 determine the correct refund amount as well as interest due to the assessee and refund the same. The relevant portion of the written submissions made on behalf of the assessee company reads as under:- Your Honour may observe that both the Original Appeal and the captioned appeal were filed for non-receipt of refund of excess tax amount paid over tax liability as determined by the learned AO under section 143/143(3) of the Act. Hon ble Tribunal disposed the Original Appeal vide its order dated 25 July 2018 and remitted the matter back to the file of AO for re-determination of correct refund amount as well as interest due to the Company with a direction to grant legitimate refund as due to the Company. The Appellant would like to submit that since the ground for non-receipt of refund along with interest has already been considered by Hon ble Tribunal in the Original Appeal, the captioned appeal may e considered academic in nature.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES C , MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM) AND SHRI RAM LAL NEGI (JM) ITA No. 4265/MUM/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 OOCL Logistics (India) Private Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax-7(1), ICC Chambers, 5th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Vs. Mumbai - 400020 Opp, Santogen Silk Mills, Mumbai - 400072 PAN: AAACO7690K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Abhishek Tilak (AR) Revenue by : Shri Kumar Padmapani Bora (DR) Date of Hearing: 16/09/2019 Date of Pronouncement: 26/09/2019 ORDER PER RAM LAL NEGI, JM assessee has filed present appeal against order dated 17.01.2017 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-13 (for short CIT(A), Mumbai, pertaining to assessment year 2009-10, whereby Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed application filed by assessee u/s 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short Act ) for rectification of appellate order passed by Ld. CIT(A). 2. assessee has challenged impugned order passed by Ld. CIT (A) on following effective grounds:- 1. Ground 1- Grant of refund It is prayed that learned AO be directed to refund INR 46,16,231 [inclusive of interest under section 244A of Act computed in intimation passed under section 143 (1) of Act] which is in nature of amount paid in excess over tax liability duly determined by AO since same does not 2 ITA No. 4265/ MUM/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 partake nature of income tax and is refundable to Appellant along with applicable interest under Act. 2. Ground 2- Mistake apparent from record. On facts and circumstances of case and in law, learned CIT (A) has erred in not appreciating fact that rectification was sought on mistake apparent from records in respect of tax refund of INR 46,16,231 not granted to Appellant though determined to be refundable under section 143 (1) of Act. 3. Ground 3- Non-receipt of refund by Company learned AO erred in determining refund amounting to INR 7,350 (inclusive of interest under section 244A of Act) in assessment order passed under section 143 (3) of Act and not considering that refund of INR 46,16,231 determined to be refundable under section 143 (1) of Act, shown as refunded to Appellant had never been refunded nor has same been adjusted against demand of any other Assessment Year(s). Appellant prays that learned DCIT be directed to verify records and grant refund along with interest in accordance with provisions of Act and after considering due credit of taxes paid. Ground 4- Short grant of interest under section 244A of Act appellant prays that AO be directed to grant interest under section 244A of Act by considering period for which refund has not been actually refunded. 3. At outset, Ld. counsel for assessee submitted that present appeal has become academic and does not require adjudication on merits in view of fact that ITAT has allowed assessee s appeal ITA No. 6028/Mum/2016 against order dated 08.07.2016 passed by Ld. CIT(A) in quantum appeal, vide which Tribunal has directed AO to re- 3 ITA No. 4265/ MUM/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 determine correct refund amount as well as interest due to assessee and refund same. 4. Ld. departmental representative did not controvert facts stated by Ld. counsel and further did not oppose submissions aforesaid. 5. After hearing both sides, we asked Ld. counsel to make written submission in this regard. Accordingly, Ld. counsel submitted written submissions dated 24.09.2019, duly signed by Managing Director of Company. relevant portion of written submissions made on behalf of assessee company reads as under:- Your Honour may observe that both Original Appeal and captioned appeal were filed for non-receipt of refund of excess tax amount paid over tax liability as determined by learned AO under section 143 (1)/143(3) of Act. Hon ble Tribunal (Bench D) disposed Original Appeal vide its order dated 25 July 2018 and remitted matter back to file of AO for re-determination of correct refund amount as well as interest due to Company with direction to grant legitimate refund as due to Company. Appellant has also filed application for giving effect to aforesaid order of Mumbai Tribunal on 11 July 2019 which is pending to be processed by Learned Assessing Officer. Copy of application is enclosed as Annexure 2. Appellant would like to submit that since ground for non-receipt of refund along with interest has already been considered by Hon ble Tribunal in Original Appeal, captioned appeal may e considered academic in nature. 4 ITA No. 4265/ MUM/2018 Assessment Year: 2009-10 5. We have perused material on record. As pointed out by Ld. counsel, present appeal of assessee has become academic/infructuous as coordinate Bench has allowed appeal filed by assessee against quantum order passed by Ld. CIT(A). In light of aforesaid facts this appeal does not require adjudication on merits. Accordingly, we dismiss present appeal of assessee being academic/infructuous. In result, appeal filed by assessee for assessment year 2009-10 is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on 26th.September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) (RAM LAL NEGI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai; Dated: 26/09/2019 Alindra, PS /Copy of Order forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent. 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard file. BY ORDER, True Copy (Dy./Asstt. Registrar), ITAT, Mumbai OOCL Logistics (India) Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax-7(1), Mumbai
Report Error