The Commissioner of Income-tax-1 v. Arvind Mithailal Agarwal - 2019-LL-0925-33

Citation	2019-LL-0925-33
Appellant Name	The Commissioner of Income-tax-1
Respondent Name	Arvind Mithailal Agarwal
Court	HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	25/09/2019
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	tax effect
Bot Summary:	P.C:- In all these Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant- Revenue, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. 2 This for the reason that the tax effect in all these appeals is less than the threshold limit as provided in CBDT Circular No.17 dated 8 th August, 2019. 3 In view of the above, all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed.

IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 908 OF 2013 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.909, 911, 919, 923, 934 & 975 OF 2013 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.1429, 1719, 3265 & 3275 OF 2018 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS.136, 2071, 2264 & 2284 OF 2019 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NOS.837, 1640 & 1807 OF 2019 Mr. Sham Walve, for Appellant. Mr. Sanjiv M. Shah, Mr. Jitendra Motwani, Mr. Vishnu Hadade, for Respondent. CORAM: M.S.SANKLECHA & NITN JAMDAR, JJ. DATE : 25th SEPTEMBER, 2019. P.C:- In all these Appeals under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), learned Counsel appearing for Appellant- Revenue, on instructions, seek to withdraw these appeals. 2 This for reason that tax effect in all these appeals is less than threshold limit as provided in CBDT Circular No.17 dated 8 th August, 2019 . 3 In view of above, all these Appeals are dismissed, as not pressed. 4 Refund of Court Fees, if any, as per Rules. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) S.R.JOSHI 1 of 1 Commissioner of Income-tax-1 v. Arvind Mithailal Agarwal

Metadata

Judgment