A. V. Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-34, Kolkata
[Citation -2019-LL-0925-10]

Citation 2019-LL-0925-10
Appellant Name A. V. Enterprises
Respondent Name Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-34, Kolkata
Court ITAT-Kolkata
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 25/09/2019
Assessment Year 2012-13
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags ex-parte order • non-appearance • service of notice • restoration of appeal
Bot Summary: At the outset itself, the Ld. AR pointed out that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex- parte order. According to Ld. AR, since the assessee is a firm and there was a dispute between the partners, the notice fixing the date of hearing was not communicated to the working partner. According to Ld. AR, if an opportunity is given the assessee, it undertakes to appear before the Ld. CIT(A). We note that the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) is an ex parte order without going into the merits of the case. Since the Ld. AR has undertaken to appear before the Ld. CIT(A), we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remand the matter back to the file of 2 ITA No. 451/Kol/2018 M/s. A.V. Enterprises, AY- 2012-13 the Ld. CIT(A) for adjudication of the appeal in accordance to law after hearing the assessee and the assessee is directed to diligently appear before the Ld. CIT(A) to pursue the appeal. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order is pronounced in the open court on 25th September, 2019.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH KOLKATA [Before Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Dr. A. L. Saini, AM] I.T.A. No. 451/Kol/2018 Assessment Year 2012-13 M/s. A. V. Enterprises Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, (PAN: AAIFA5269K) Circle-34, Kolkata. Appellant Respondent Date of Hearing 17.09.2019 Date of Pronouncement 25.09.2019 For Appellant Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA For Respondent Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT, Sr. DR ORDER Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM This appeal preferred by assessee is against order of Ld. CIT(A)-10, Kolkata dated 28.12.2017 for AY 2012-13. 2. At outset itself, Ld. AR pointed out that Ld. CIT(A) has passed ex- parte order. According to Ld. AR, since assessee is firm and there was dispute between partners, notice fixing date of hearing was not communicated to working partner. According to Ld. AR, if opportunity is given assessee, it undertakes to appear before Ld. CIT(A). We note that impugned order of Ld. CIT(A) is ex parte order without going into merits of case. We note that for reasons stated above, working partner did not receive notice, therefore, could not depute AR to plead case of assessee. Since Ld. AR has undertaken to appear before Ld. CIT(A), we set aside order of Ld. CIT(A) and remand matter back to file of 2 ITA No. 451/Kol/2018 M/s. A.V. Enterprises, AY- 2012-13 Ld. CIT(A) for adjudication of appeal in accordance to law after hearing assessee and assessee is directed to diligently appear before Ld. CIT(A) to pursue appeal. 3. In result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order is pronounced in open court on 25th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. A. L. Saini) (Aby. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated 25th September, 2019 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of order forwarded to 1. Appellant M/s. A. V. Enterprises, 51, Ezra Street, 2nd floor, Kolkata- 700 001. 2 Respondent ACIT, Circle-34, Kolkata. 3. CIT(A)-10, Kolkata 4. CIT-, , Kolkata. 5. DR, ITAT, Kolkata. (sent through e-mail) , By order, Assistant Registrar A. V. Enterprises v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-34, Kolkata
Report Error