DCIT, Central Circle – 7(3), Mumbai v. National Standard India Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0924-69]

Citation 2019-LL-0924-69
Appellant Name DCIT, Central Circle – 7(3), Mumbai
Respondent Name National Standard India Ltd.
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 24/09/2019
Assessment Year 2012-13
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags commercial expediency • wholly and exclusively for business purposes • compensatory payments • revenue expenditure • cancellation of contract • low tax effect • disallowance of compensation
Bot Summary: The Revenue has raised the following grounds in its appeal: - 1(a). On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of.1,30,80,781/- made 2 ITA No. 4824/MUM/2017 M/s. National Standard India Ltd. by the Assessing Officer on the ground that the payment of the said amount to the customers/buyers in the cancelled project was justified by commercial expediency and was laid out wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business of the assessee. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the agreement with the customers/buyers in the cancelled project did not stipulate any payment of compensation. 1 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the assessee had cancelled the project 'Lodha Excellencia' and decided to come up with a new project by utilizing more FSI and increasing the saleable area and on that account the payment of compensation of Rs. 1,30,80,781/-could best be termed as capital outlay for a new project and hence, disallowable as revenue expenditure. At the time of hearing, Authorized Representative of the assessee submitted that tax effect on the issue in the present appeal is.40,41,961/- which is below. 142/2007-ITJ, the appeal of the Revenue is not maintainable. We have heard the submissions and perused the grounds of appeal in this appeal.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH B , MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD, HON BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, HON BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 4824/MUM/2017 (A.Y: 2012-13) DCIT Central Circle 7(3) v. M/s. National Standard India Ltd. R.No. 656, 6th Floor 216, Shah and Nahar Industrial Road Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Off. Dr. E. Moses Road, Worli Mumbai 400 020 Mumbai 400 018 PAN No: AAACN9808L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Aarti Sathe Department by : Shri Chaitanya Anjaria Date of hearing : 09.08.2019 Date of pronouncement : 24.09.2019 ORDER PER C.N. PRASAD (JM) This appeal is filed by Revenue against order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-49, Mumbai [hereinafter in short Ld.CIT(A) ] in Appeal No. CIT(A)-49/IT-76/2015-16 dated 26.04.2017 for Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. Revenue has raised following grounds in its appeal: - 1(a). "On facts and circumstances of case and in law, Ld CIT(A) erred in deleting disallowance of .1,30,80,781/- made 2 ITA No. 4824/MUM/2017 (A.Y: 2012-13) M/s. National Standard India Ltd. by Assessing Officer on ground that payment of said amount to customers/buyers in cancelled project was justified by commercial expediency and was laid out wholly and exclusively for purposes of business of assessee." 1 (b). "On facts and circumstances of case and in law, Ld CIT(A) failed to appreciate that agreement with customers/buyers in cancelled project did not stipulate any payment of compensation." 1 (c) " On facts and in circumstances of case and in law, Ld.CIT(A) failed to appreciate that assessee had cancelled project 'Lodha Excellencia' and decided to come up with new project by utilizing more FSI and increasing saleable area and on that account payment of compensation of Rs. 1,30,80,781/-could best be termed as capital outlay for new project and hence, disallowable as revenue expenditure." 3. At time of hearing, Authorized Representative of assessee submitted that tax effect on issue in present appeal is .40,41,961/- which is below .50 Lacs and in view of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 in F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt), appeal of Revenue is not maintainable. 4. Departmental Representative also agreed with above submission of Authorized Representative of assessee. 5. We have heard submissions and perused grounds of appeal in this appeal. We find that tax effect in this appeal is less than .50 Lakhs and therefore appeal of Revenue is not maintainable 3 ITA No. 4824/MUM/2017 (A.Y: 2012-13) M/s. National Standard India Ltd. on account of low tax effect in view of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. Hence this appeal is dismissed. 6. In result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed. Order Pronounced in Open Court on 24th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (RAJESH KUMAR) (C.N. PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai / Dated 24/09/2019 Giridhar, Sr.PS Copy of Order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent. 3. CIT(A), Mumbai. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER, (Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mum DCIT, Central Circle 7(3), Mumbai v. National Standard India Ltd
Report Error