Harsh Gupta v. ITO, Ward – 5(3), Hyderabad
[Citation -2019-LL-0920-66]

Citation 2019-LL-0920-66
Appellant Name Harsh Gupta
Respondent Name ITO, Ward – 5(3), Hyderabad
Court ITAT-Hyderabad
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/09/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags unconditional stay • extension of stay • sale of shares • gain on sale • penny stock • disallowance of capital gain • exempt income
Bot Summary: He therefore prayed for stay, pending disposal of the appeal. Opposed the grant of stay submitting that though the Tribunal had granted unconditional stay earlier, and the matter had come up for hearing on 23.5.2019 and 09.07.2019, the case was adjourned at the request of the assessee. Having regard to the rival contentions and material placed on record, we find that absolute stay was granted vide S.A.No. 27/2019 and the matter had come up for hearing on 23.5.2019 since the Bench did not function on that date, and the matter got adjourned to 09.07.2019 and on 09.07.2019 the matter got adjourned to 29/08/2019 at the request of Ld.Counsel for the assessee. Thus, only on one occasion the assessee has sought adjournment and thus the appeal could not be heard and disposed of. Taking the above facts into consideration and also the fact that the assessee has already paid Rs.90,000/-, we deem it fit and proper to grant stay for a further period of 180 days on condition that the assessee shall pay a further amount of 10 of the outstanding demand of tax on or before 30th September, 2019. The Stay shall be in force for a period of 180 days or till disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH : Hyderabad Before Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, Judicial Member And Shri A. Mohan Alankamony, Accountant Member S.A.No. 207/Hyd./2019 (In ITA No. 1470/Hyd./2018) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Sri Harsh Gupta vs. ITO, Ward 5(3) 5-8-555/1, 1st floor Hyderabad Abids Road Hyderabad 500 001 PAN: AMLPG0933H (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee: Sh. K.C. Devdas, A.R. For Revenue: Sh. S. Mookambikeyan, D.R. Date of Hearing : 13/09/19 Date of Pronouncement 20/09/19 ORDER Per Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, J.M. This Stay Application is filed by assessee seeking extension of stay of recovery of outstanding demand of taxes of Rs.3,59,950/-. 2. It is stated by Ld.Counsel for assessee that demand for taxes has arisen due to disallowance of long term capital gain on sale of shares which was claimed as exempt u/s 10(38) of I.T. Act, 1961. He submitted that assessee is in very tight financial position and therefore sought stay of recovery of outstanding demand of tax. He submitted that earlier in S.A.27/2019, Tribunal had granted stay for period of 180 days taking into consideration fact that assessee has already paid Rs.90,000/- S.A.No.207/Hyd/2019 (In ITA no.1470/Hyd/2018) AY:2014-15 Sh. Harsh Gupta which is equal to 20% of total outstanding demand. He therefore prayed for stay, pending disposal of appeal. 3. Ld.DR however, opposed grant of stay submitting that though Tribunal had granted unconditional stay earlier, and matter had come up for hearing on 23.5.2019 and 09.07.2019, case was adjourned at request of assessee. 4. Having regard to rival contentions and material placed on record, we find that absolute stay was granted vide S.A.No.27/2019 and matter had come up for hearing on 23.5.2019 since Bench did not function on that date, and matter got adjourned to 09.07.2019 and on 09.07.2019 matter got adjourned to 29/08/2019 at request of Ld.Counsel for assessee. We find that again on 29.08.2019, Bench did not function and therefore case was further adjourned to 29.10.2019. Thus, only on one occasion assessee has sought adjournment and thus appeal could not be heard and disposed of. Further since it is penny stock case, Tribunal also has been adjourning case for want of fixation of similar matters for hearing. 4.1. Taking above facts into consideration and also fact that assessee has already paid Rs.90,000/-, we deem it fit and proper to grant stay for further period of 180 days on condition that assessee shall pay further amount of 10% of outstanding demand of tax on or before 30th September, 2019. Stay shall be in force for period of 180 days or till disposal of appeal, whichever is earlier. 4.2. Stay Application is accordingly allowed. 5. In result Stay Application is allowed. Order pronounced in Open Court on 20th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (A.MOHAN ALANKAMONY) (P MADHAVI DEVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 20th September, 2019. *GMV 2 S.A.No.207/Hyd/2019 (In ITA no.1470/Hyd/2018) AY:2014-15 Sh. Harsh Gupta Copy forwarded to: 1. Sh. Harsh Gupta, 5-8-555/1, 1st /floor, Abids Road, Hyderabad 5001 001. 2. ITO, Ward 5(3), Hyderabad. 3. CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad. 4. Pr.CIT -4, Hyderabad 5. DR, ITAT, Hyderabad. 6. Guard File. 3 Harsh Gupta v. ITO, Ward 5(3), Hyderabad
Report Error