The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 2, Pune v. Avinash Nivrutti Bhosale
[Citation -2019-LL-0919-70]

Citation 2019-LL-0919-70
Appellant Name The Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle – 2, Pune
Respondent Name Avinash Nivrutti Bhosale
Court ITAT-Pune
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 19/09/2019
Assessment Year 2012-13
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags monetary limit • low tax effect • disallowance of expenses
Bot Summary: The Ld. AR, Shri Nikhil Pathak along with Shri Nimit Gujrathi submitted at the outset that the appeal of Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax effect in terms of recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019. The Ld. AR submitted that the Department in appeal assailing the findings of Commissioner of Income Tax in restricting the disallowance on helicopter expenses to 1/7th instead of 1/4th disallowed by the Assessing Officer. The Ld. DR, Shri Pankaj Garg fairly admitted that in the present appeal by the Department tax effect is less than Rs.50 Lakhs. The Ld. AR submitted that the Department in appeal has assailing the findings of Commissioner of Income Tax in restricting the disallowance on helicopter expenses to 1/7th instead of 1/4th disallowed by the Assessing Officer. Undisputedly, the tax effect involved in appeal is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019 for filing of appeals before the Tribunal by the Department. The CBDT vide circular dated 08-08-2019 has amended Para 3 of Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11-07-2018 thereby enhancing monetary limit of tax effect from Rs.20 Lakhs to Rs.50 Lakhs for filing of appeals by the Department before the Tribunal. Thus, without going into merit of the issues raised in the appeal, in view of the CBDT Circular the present appeal of the Revenue is dismissed on account of low tax effect.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER. ITA No.1372/PUN/2017 Assessment Year 2012-13 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2, Pune Appellant V/s. Shri Avinash Nivrutti Bhosale, 2, Abil House, Range Hill Corner, Ganesh Khind Road, Pune 411007 PAN ABTPB8151F Respondent Assessee by Shri Nikhil Pathak & Shri Nimit Gujrathi Revenue by Shri Pankaj Garg Date of Hearing 17-09-2019 Date of Pronouncement 19-09-2019 ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM This appeal by Revenue against order dated 27-02-2017 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Pune for assessment year 2012-13. 2 ITA No.1372/PUN/2017, A.Y. 2012-13 2. Ld. AR, Shri Nikhil Pathak along with Shri Nimit Gujrathi submitted at outset that appeal of Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax effect in terms of recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019. Ld. AR submitted that Department in appeal assailing findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in restricting disallowance on helicopter expenses to 1/7th instead of 1/4th disallowed by Assessing Officer. 3. Ld. DR, Shri Pankaj Garg fairly admitted that in present appeal by Department tax effect is less than Rs.50 Lakhs. 4. Heard both parties and perused materials available on record. Ld. AR submitted that Department in appeal has assailing findings of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in restricting disallowance on helicopter expenses to 1/7th instead of 1/4th disallowed by Assessing Officer. Undisputedly, tax effect involved in appeal is less than monetary limit prescribed by recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, dated 08-08-2019 for filing of appeals before Tribunal by Department. CBDT vide circular dated 08-08-2019 (supra) has amended Para 3 of Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11-07-2018 thereby enhancing monetary limit of tax effect from Rs.20 Lakhs to Rs.50 Lakhs for filing of appeals by Department before Tribunal. Thus, without going into merit of issues raised in appeal, in view of CBDT Circular (supra) present appeal of Revenue is dismissed on account of low tax effect. 3 ITA No.1372/PUN/2017, A.Y. 2012-13 5. Before parting, we clarify here that Revenue shall be at liberty to approach Tribunal for restoration of appeal, with requisite material to show that appeal is protected by exceptions prescribed in Para 10 of Circular dated 11-07-2018 and its amendment dated 20-08-2018. 6. In result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on 19th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (R.S. Syal) (S.S. Viswanethra Ravi) VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER / Pune Dated 19th September, 2019 RK / Copy of Order forwarded to 1. Appellant. 2. Respondent. 3. CIT(A)-3, Pune 4. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Pune 5. DR, ITAT, B Bench, Pune. 6. Guard File. True Copy BY ORDER, Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 2, Pune v. Avinash Nivrutti Bhosale
Report Error