IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 223 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-23 .. Appellant Vs Salil Shah Family Pvt. Trust Respondent Along with INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 505 of 2017; No. 947 of 2017; No. 1216 of 2017; No. 1217 of 2017; No. 1287 of 2017; No. 1615 of 2017; No. 1189 of 2017; (Lodging) No. 395 of 2019; (Lodging) No. 509 of 2019; (Lodging) No. 1521 of 2019. Mr.Sham Walve, for Appellant in all above Appeals. Mr.Upendra Lokegaonkar i/b M/s.Mint & Confreres, for Respondent in ITXA No. 223 of 2017. Mr.Jignesh Shah, for Respondent in ITXA No.505 of 2017. Mr.K.C.Pandey, for Respondent in ITXA No.947 of 2017. Mr.Rahul Hakani, for Respondent in ITXA(L) No.509 of 2019. Mr. Ruturaj H.Gurjar, for Respondent in ITXA No.1189 of 2017. Mr.Atul Jasani, for Respondent in ITXA No.1216 of 2017, ITXA No.1217 of 2017and ITXA No.1287 of 2017. CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ. Date : 19 September 2019. P.C. : Mr.Walve, learned counsel appearing in all these appeals on instructions seeks to withdraw these appeals. This for reason ::: Uploaded on - 23/09/2019 904 to 914 ITXA 223-17 to doc that tax effect involved in present Appeals is less than threshold limit provided under Central Board for Direct Taxes Circular No.17/2019 dated 18 August 2019. 2. Accordingly Appeals disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Refund of Court fees as per rules. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-23 v. Salil Shah Family Pvt. Trust