Darshan R. Mehta v. Income-tax Officer-17(3)(1), Mumbai
[Citation -2019-LL-0917-15]

Citation 2019-LL-0917-15
Appellant Name Darshan R. Mehta
Respondent Name Income-tax Officer-17(3)(1), Mumbai
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/09/2019
Assessment Year 2011-12
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags recalling issue
Bot Summary: Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year in short referred to as AY 2011-12 is partly recalled matter. When the appeal was called for hearing, learned Authorized Representative for Assessee, Shri N.M.Porwal, submitted that the assessee is no more interested in 2 ITA No.4465/Mum/2015 Darshan R. Mehta Assessment Year 2011-12 contesting the issues recalled by the Tribunal and therefore, not pressing these issues. Keeping in view the said submissions, the issue stand dismissed as being not pressed. The appeal may be treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 17th September, 2019.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE HON BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND HON BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM I.T.A. No.4465/Mum/2015 (Assessment Year:2011-12) Mr. Darshan R. Mehta Income Tax Officer-17(3)(1) 12, Murli Mahal, II Floor Mumbai. 420 Bhavdaji Cross Road King Circle, Matunga Vs. Mumbai-400 019. PAN/GIR No. AADPM -3310-J (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue by Shri Akhtar H. Ansari-Ld.DR Assessee by Shri N.M. Porwal-Ld. AR 17/09/2019 Date of Hearing 17/09/2019 Date of Pronouncement ORDER Per Bench - 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [in short referred to as AY] 2011-12 is partly recalled matter. However, when appeal was called for hearing, learned Authorized Representative for Assessee, Shri N.M.Porwal, submitted that assessee is no more interested in 2 ITA No.4465/Mum/2015 Darshan R. Mehta Assessment Year 2011-12 contesting issues recalled by Tribunal and therefore, not pressing these issues. revenue raised no objection against same. 2. Keeping in view said submissions, issue stand dismissed as being not pressed. 3. Consequently, appeal may be treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in open court on 17th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (Mahavir Singh) (Manoj Kumar Aggarwal) Judicial Member Accountant Member Mumbai Dated 17/09/2019 Sr.PS:-Jaisy Varghese Copy of Order forwarded to 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT concerned 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File BY ORDER, (Dy. Asstt.Registrar) , ITAT, Mumbai. Darshan R. Mehta v. Income-tax Officer-17(3)(1), Mumbai
Report Error