Signode India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3(2), Hyderabad
[Citation -2019-LL-0913-84]

Citation 2019-LL-0913-84
Appellant Name Signode India Limited
Respondent Name Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3(2), Hyderabad
Court ITAT-Hyderabad
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/09/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags depreciation on goodwill • outstanding demand • irreparable loss • stay petition • stay of demand of tax
Bot Summary: PAN: AAHCS8120M Assessee by Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR Date of hearing 13/09/2019 Date of pronouncement: 13/09/2019 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM. This Stay Application is filed by the assessee seeking stay from recovery of the outstanding demand of Rs. 9,35,43,874/- for the assessment year 2014-15. At the outset the Ld. AR submitted before us that the assessee has already paid Rs. 3,58,85,968/- against the total outstanding demand of Rs. 12,94,29,842/- 2 and balance to be paid is Rs. 9,35,43,874/-. Learned Counsel for the Assessee also submitted that in the earlier occasion, the ITAT has granted stay from recovery of outstanding demand till the date of hearing of the appeal i.e., on 11/07/2019 vide order dated 02/07/2019 in SA No.154/Hyd/2019 and thereafter the assessee has paid Rs. 1 Cr and now the balance outstanding demand is Rs. 9,35,43,874/-. Ld. AR further submitted that there is no change in the facts and circumstances of the case and since the assessee is having a strong case in its favour being allowability of depreciation on goodwill which is covered in favour of the assessee by number of decisions, it was pleaded that stay may be granted from recovery of the outstanding demand, otherwise it would bring irreparable loss to the assessee. On further perusing the records, we find that on the earlier occasion stay was granted to the assessee till 11/07/2019, but the assessee thereafter sought several adjournments. Considering the prayer of the assessee with respect to its financial crunch, taking a lenient view, we hereby grant stay to the assessee from 3 recovering the outstanding demand by the Revenue for a period of 90 days from this day or the disposal of the appeal whichever is earlier. In the result, the Stay Petition of the assessee is allowed as indicated herein above.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SA No.206/Hyd/2019 (In ITA No.954/Hyd/2019) Assessment Year 2014-15 Signode India Limited, Vs. Deputy Commissioner of 3 rd Floor, Jyothi Majestic, Income Tax, 8-2-120/84, R.No. 2, Circle-3(2), Banjara Hills, Hyderabad. Hyderabad-34. PAN: AAHCS8120M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Sri S. Rama Rao Revenue by Sri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR Date of hearing 13/09/2019 Date of pronouncement: 13/09/2019 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM. This Stay Application is filed by assessee seeking stay from recovery of outstanding demand of Rs. 9,35,43,874/- for assessment year 2014-15. 2. At outset Ld. AR submitted before us that assessee has already paid Rs. 3,58,85,968/- against total outstanding demand of Rs. 12,94,29,842/- (Tax - Rs. 9,05,10,370 + Rs. 3,89,19,472 interest) 2 and balance to be paid is Rs. 9,35,43,874/-. Learned Counsel for Assessee also submitted that in earlier occasion, ITAT has granted stay from recovery of outstanding demand till date of hearing of appeal i.e., on 11/07/2019 vide order dated 02/07/2019 in SA No.154/Hyd/2019 and thereafter assessee has paid Rs. 1 Cr and now balance outstanding demand is Rs. 9,35,43,874/-. Ld. AR further submitted that there is no change in facts and circumstances of case and since assessee is having strong case in its favour being allowability of depreciation on goodwill which is covered in favour of assessee by number of decisions, it was pleaded that stay may be granted from recovery of outstanding demand, otherwise it would bring irreparable loss to assessee. Ld DR vehemently opposed to submission of Ld AR. 3. We have heard rival submissions and carefully perused materials on record. It appears from records that assessee has paid nearly 30% of outstanding demand of tax. On further perusing records, we find that on earlier occasion stay was granted to assessee till 11/07/2019, but assessee thereafter sought several adjournments. In this situation, we are of considered view that assessee does not deserve for extension of stay. However, considering prayer of assessee with respect to its financial crunch, taking lenient view, we hereby grant stay to assessee from 3 recovering outstanding demand by Revenue for period of 90 days from this day or disposal of appeal whichever is earlier. We also direct Registry to post appeal for hearing on 07/11/2019 being convenient date available for early hearing. We also make it clear that if assessee do not cooperate with proceedings before Tribunal on next date of hearing i.e., 07/11/2019 by seeking adjournments stating frivolous reasons this grant of stay shall instantly stand vacated. It is ordered accordingly. Since next date of hearing is intimated to both parties, notice need not be issued. 4. In result, Stay Petition of assessee is allowed as indicated herein above. Pronounced in open Court on 13 th September, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (P. MADHAVI DEVI) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Hyderabad, Dated 13 th September, 2019 OKK Copy to:- 1) Signode India Limited, 3 r d Floor, Jyothi Majestic, 8-2-120/84, R. No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-34. 2) DCIT, Circle-3(2), Hyderabad. 3) CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad 4) Pr. CIT-4, Hyderabad 5) DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 6) Guard File Signode India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-3(2), Hyderabad
Report Error