Nilesh Bhawnani v. Income-tax Officer, Ward- 32(3), Kolkata
[Citation -2019-LL-0913-3]

Citation 2019-LL-0913-3
Appellant Name Nilesh Bhawnani
Respondent Name Income-tax Officer, Ward- 32(3), Kolkata
Court ITAT-Kolkata
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/09/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags purchase consideration • date of agreement • conveyance deed • cheque payment • difference in purchases • stamp duty valuation
Bot Summary: It transpires during the course of hearing that the assessee s sole substantive ground challenges correctness of both the lower authorities action making sec. 56(2)(vii)(b) addition of 5,74,548/- on account of difference in sale / purchase consideration of the property as per the agreement dated 15.04.2012 amounting to 50 lacs the registered conveyance deed executed on 05.07.2013 for stamp value of 1,11,65,000/- as against the DVO s valuation coming to 55,74,548/-; respectively. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival contentions against and in support of the impugned addition as per assessee and Revenue s stands. It emerges during the curse of hearing that the assessee had paid 20 lacs through cheque No.000050 dated 04.04.2012 through his Bank of India account to the vendor concerned as evident from page 57 in the paper book forming part of the agreement dated 15.04.2012 to this effect. 56(2)(vii)(B) clause-2 read with first and second proviso thereto making it clear that the former one applies to adopt stamp value on the date of agreement in case the transfer of the property and registration are not the same whereas the latter proviso makes it explicitly clear that former shall apply only in a case where the amount of consideration refer to therein, or a part thereof, has been made by any mode other than cash or on or before the date of the relevant agreement. We re-emphasise that the assessee s cheque payment is dated 04.04.2012. It had entered into the corresponding agreement to purchase on 15.04.2012.


, , IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri S.S.Godara, Judicial Member and Dr. A.L. Saini, Accountant Member ITA No.193/Kol/2018 Assessment Year :2014-15 Nilesh Bhawnani V/s. Income Tax Officer, Apartment No. 4H, 4 t h ward-32(3), 10B, Floor, Sunrise Towers, Middleton Row, 2 n d Tower-II, 134B, Beliaghata Floor, Kolkata-700071 Road, Kolkata-700015 [PAN No. AIAPB3597M] Appellant .. Respondent By Appellant Shri Om Prakash. Baid, FCA & Shri Ami Chand Baid, AR By Respondent Shri C.J. Singh, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 05-09-2019 /Date of Pronouncement 13-09-2019 ORDER PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:- This assessee s appeal for assessment year 2014-15 arises against Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9 Kolkata s order dated 28.12.2017 passed in case No.301/CIT(A)-9/Wd-32(3)/2016- 17/Kol, involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961; in short Act . Heard both parties. Case file perused. ITA No.193/Kol/2018 A.Y. 2014-15 Nilesh Bhawnani Vs. ITO Wd-32(3) Kol. Page 2 2. It transpires during course of hearing that assessee s sole substantive ground challenges correctness of both lower authorities action making sec. 56(2)(vii)(b) addition of 5,74,548/- on account of difference in sale / purchase consideration of property as per agreement dated 15.04.2012 amounting to 50 lacs registered conveyance deed executed on 05.07.2013 for stamp value of 1,11,65,000/- as against DVO s valuation coming to 55,74,548/-; respectively. 3. We have given our thoughtful consideration to rival contentions against and in support of impugned addition as per assessee and Revenue s stands. It emerges during curse of hearing that assessee had paid 20 lacs through cheque No.000050 dated 04.04.2012 through his Bank of India account to vendor concerned as evident from page 57 in paper book forming part of agreement dated 15.04.2012 to this effect. There is no dispute to correctness of this clinching aspect from Revenue side. We thus quote sec. 56(2)(vii)(B) clause-2 read with first and second proviso thereto making it clear that former one applies to adopt stamp value on date of agreement in case transfer of property and registration are not same whereas latter proviso makes it explicitly clear that former shall apply only in case where amount of consideration refer to therein, or part thereof, has been made by any mode other than cash or on or before date of relevant agreement. We re-emphasise that assessee s cheque payment is dated 04.04.2012. It had entered into corresponding agreement to purchase on 15.04.2012. We therefore see no merit in both lower authorities action making ITA No.193/Kol/2018 A.Y. 2014-15 Nilesh Bhawnani Vs. ITO Wd-32(3) Kol. Page 3 impugned addition of 5,74,548/- u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of Act. same is directed to be deleted. 4. This assessee s appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in open court 13/09/2019 Sd/- Sd/- ( A.L.Saini) (S.S.Godara) (Accountant Member) (Judicial Member) Kolkata, *Dkp 13/09/2019 Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Appellant-Nilesh Bhawnani Apartment No. 4H, 4th Floor, Sunrise Towers Tower-II, 134B, Beliaghata Road, Kolkata-15 2. Respondent-ITO Ward-32(3), 10B, Middleton Row, 2nd Fl, Kolkatak-71 3. 3 4 Concerned CIT Kolkata 4. 4 CIT (A) Kolkata 5. 7 ' ' 3 , 3 DR, ITAT, Kolkata 6. Guard file. By order//True Copy/ 3 , Nilesh Bhawnani v. Income-tax Officer, Ward- 32(3), Kolkata
Report Error