D.K Construction v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax
[Citation -2019-LL-0909-31]

Citation 2019-LL-0909-31
Appellant Name D.K Construction
Respondent Name Principal Commissioner of Income-tax
Court HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 09/09/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags attachment of property
Bot Summary: This petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by notice dated 09.08.2019, Annexure P/7 issued to the petitioner under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act attaching the petitioner's bank account and investment made in mutual funds on account of default and violation on the part of the petitioner of the interim order dated 11.03.2019 passed in the proceedings pending before the authorities. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has deposited Rs.5.00 lac for the months, June, July and August, and is also willing to deposit the amount for the upcoming months. It is submitted that the interim order was passed in the petitioner's case on 11.03.2019 but on account of paucity of funds, the petitioner could not deposit the amount for the months of March, April and May. It is stated that on account of this default, a notice was issued to the petitioner on 06.08.2019 which was received by the petitioner on 09.08.2019 after the date of hearing fixed by the authorities on 08.08.2019. It is submitted that without waiting for a response from the petitioner, the respondent authorities have passed the impugned order attaching the petitioner's bank account as well as the investment made by the petitioner in view of the default of the interim order passed by the authorities. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to deposit the arrears as well as the future amount as per the interim order dated 11.03.2019, for which he may be given an opportunity to do so by the authorities. The petitioner may also approach the authorities for early disposal of the appeal as per the internal circulars of the department. With the aforesaid directions and observations, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.


The High Court Of Madhya Pradesh WP-18221-2019 (M/S D.K CONSTRUCTION Vs PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX) Jabalpur, Dated : 09-09-2019 Shri G.N. Purohit, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Nitin Agrawal, for petitioner. Heard on question of admission. This petition has been filed by petitioner being aggrieved by notice dated 09.08.2019, Annexure P/7 issued to petitioner under Section 226(3) of Income Tax Act attaching petitioner's bank account and investment made in mutual funds on account of default and violation on part of petitioner of interim order dated 11.03.2019 passed in proceedings pending before authorities. learned Senior Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that petitioner has deposited Rs.5.00 lac for months, June, July and August, and is also willing to deposit amount for upcoming months. It is submitted that interim order was passed in petitioner's case on 11.03.2019 but on account of paucity of funds, petitioner could not deposit amount for months of March, April and May. It is stated that on account of this default, notice was issued to petitioner on 06.08.2019 which was received by petitioner on 09.08.2019 after date of hearing fixed by authorities on 08.08.2019. It is submitted that without waiting for response from petitioner, respondent authorities have passed impugned order attaching petitioner's bank account as well as investment made by petitioner in view of default of interim order passed by authorities. learned Senior Counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is willing to deposit arrears as well as future amount as per interim order dated 11.03.2019, for which he may be given opportunity to do so by authorities. In view of aforesaid statement of learned Senior counsel for Digitally signed by SUSHEEL KUMAR JHARIYA Date: 12/09/2019 12:19:14 2 WP-18221-2019 petitioner and fact that petitioner is willing to deposit arrears as well as undertakes to deposit amount in future as well, petition filed by petitioner is disposed of with direction to effect that in case petitioner approaches authority concerned by filing such application alongwith copy of petition and copy of order passed today, authority concerned shall take same into consideration and thereafter, in case petitioner complies with undertaking and statement made by him, consider restoring interim order passed by authorities on 11.03.2019. petitioner may also approach authorities for early disposal of appeal as per internal circulars of department. With aforesaid directions and observations, petition filed by petitioner stands disposed of. C.C. as per rules. (RAVI SHANKAR JHA) (VISHAL DHAGAT) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE sj Digitally signed by SUSHEEL KUMAR JHARIYA Date: 12/09/2019 12:19:14 D.K Construction v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax
Report Error