Supermax Personal Care Private Limited v. Dy. CIT(LTU)-1, Mumbai
[Citation -2019-LL-0906-76]

Citation 2019-LL-0906-76
Appellant Name Supermax Personal Care Private Limited
Respondent Name Dy. CIT(LTU)-1, Mumbai
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 06/09/2019
Assessment Year 2013-14
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags extension of stay
Bot Summary: We have heard both the counsel and perused the records. The learned counsel of the assessee contented that a stay in this case has been granted by this tribunal vide Stay Application No.86/Mum/2019 vide order dated 01.03.2019. Counsel of the assessee further submitted that the Income Tax Appeal was already been heard on 09.07.2019 and the order is awaited. Counsel of the assessee prayed that extension of stay may kindly be granted. On careful consideration we note that the Income Tax Appeal under consideration has already been heard on 09.07.2019 in our considered opinion, the stay for a period of three months can be granted. Accordingly, we grant limited stay for a period of three months from the date of this order or the pronouncement of the order in the Income Tax Appeal, whichever is earlier. In the result, this application for stay is disposed off as above.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL J BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM SA No. 351/Mum/2019 (Arising out of ITA No.7041/Mum/2017) (Assessment Year: 2013-14) Supermax Personal Care Private Limited Dy. CIT(LTU)-1, Wagle Estate, P.O. LBS Marg, Mumbai Vs. Thane (W) 400 604 PAN/GIR No. AAOCS 7144 Q (Applicant) : (Respondent) Applicant by : Shri Nishant Thakkar & Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala Respondent by : Shri D. G. Pansai Date of Hearing : 06.09.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 06.09.2019 ORDER Per Shamim Yahya, A. M.: By way of this stay application, assessee seeks extension of stay of total demand of tax on interest outstanding amounting to Rs.28,37,22,865/- for assessment year (A.Y. for short) 2013-14. 2. We have heard both counsel and perused records. learned counsel of assessee contented that stay in this case has been granted by this tribunal vide Stay Application No.86/Mum/2019 vide order dated 01.03.2019. ld. Counsel of assessee further submitted that Income Tax Appeal was already been heard on 09.07.2019 and order is awaited. Hence, ld. Counsel of assessee prayed that extension of stay may kindly be granted. 2 S No . 3 5 1 / Mu m /2 0 1 9 Supermax Personal Care Private Limited 3. On careful consideration we note that Income Tax Appeal under consideration has already been heard on 09.07.2019, hence, in our considered opinion, stay for period of three months can be granted. 4. Accordingly, we grant limited stay for period of three months from date of this order or pronouncement of order in Income Tax Appeal, whichever is earlier. 4. In result, this application for stay is disposed off as above. Order pronounced in open court on 06.09.2019 Sd/- Sd/- (Amarjit Singh) (Shamim Yahya) Judicial Member Accountant Member Mumbai; Dated : 06.09.2019 Roshani, Sr. PS Copy of Order forwarded to : 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT - concerned 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File BY ORDER, (Dy./Asstt. Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai Supermax Personal Care Private Limited v. Dy. CIT(LTU)-1, Mumbai
Report Error