Krishna Kumar Agarwal v. Director of Income-tax (Investigation) Lucknow & 5 Others
[Citation -2019-LL-0904-27]

Citation 2019-LL-0904-27
Appellant Name Krishna Kumar Agarwal
Respondent Name Director of Income-tax (Investigation) Lucknow & 5 Others
Court HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/09/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags representation • release of seized documents
Bot Summary: The present petition has been filed for the following main relief:- A writ of mandamus or any other writ commanding Opposite Party No. 1, Opposite Party No. 2 and Opposite Party No. 4 to return the papers, documents and files seized during the course of search of as pr Annexure No. 8. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner may be permitted to move a representation stating therein the entire facts and circumstances with respect to his grievance and opposite party no. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. If such representation is preferred by the petitioners to the opposite party no. 3, the same shall be considered and decided by the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan Rai Marg, Lucknow by a speaking and reasoned order, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, say within a period of four weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid terms, the writ petition is disposed of finally.


Court No. - 3 Case :- MISC. BENCH No. - 19024 of 2017 Petitioner :- Shri Krishna Kumar Agarwal Respondent :- Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) Lucknow & 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Desh Deepak Chopra,Amit Jaiswal,Jai Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G. Hon'ble Anil Kumar,J. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard, Sri Desh Deepak Chopra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Jai Prakash Singh, learned Counsel for petitioner and Sri Manish Mishra, learned Counsel for respondent-State. present petition has been filed for following main relief:- (i) writ of mandamus or any other writ commanding Opposite Party No. 1, Opposite Party No. 2 and Opposite Party No. 4 to return papers, documents and files seized during course of search of as pr Annexure No. 8." Learned Counsel for petitioners has submitted that petitioner may be permitted to move representation stating therein entire facts and circumstances with respect to his grievance and opposite party no.-3 i.e. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle), P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan Rai Marg, Lucknow be directed to decide representation. In view of above, without entering into merits of issue, petitioner is permitted to move fresh representation before opposite party no.-3 i.e. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle), P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan Rai Marg, Lucknow pleading his grievances, enclosing therewith relevant documents, which are necessary for disposal of representation within period of two weeks from today. If such representation is preferred by petitioners to opposite party no. 3, same shall be considered and decided by opposite party no. 3 i.e. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle), P.K. Complex, Raja Ram Mohan Rai Marg, Lucknow by speaking and reasoned order, after giving opportunity of hearing to petitioner, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, say within period of four weeks from date of presentation of certified copy of this order along with representation. With aforesaid terms, writ petition is disposed of finally. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) (Anil Kumar,J.) Order Date :- 4.9.2019/Jyoti/- Krishna Kumar Agarwal v. Director of Income-tax (Investigation) Lucknow & 5 Other
Report Error