Vishwanath Ramchandra Panvelkar v. DCIT, Circle- 2, Thane
[Citation -2019-LL-0903-126]

Citation 2019-LL-0903-126
Appellant Name Vishwanath Ramchandra Panvelkar
Respondent Name DCIT, Circle- 2, Thane
Court ITAT-Mumbai
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 03/09/2019
Assessment Year 2014-15
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags reasonable opportunity • reasonable cause • ex-parte order • delay in filing appeal • reason for delay • condonation of delay • non-appearance
Bot Summary: At the outset, we notice that the appeal is delayed by 22 days. The Ld. A.R. explained before the Bench the reasons attributable to the delayed filing of appeal by referring to the affidavit filed explaining the delay. The ld Dr strongly objected the condoning the delay. The issue raised in 1st ground of appeal is against the order of Ld. CIT(A) being the ex-parte order dismissing the appeal of the assessee when the assessee failed to attend the hearing before the Ld. CIT(A) due to ill health which were beyond the control of the assessee. Considering the facts of the case and the arguments of the rival parties, we are of the opinion that assessee needs to be given one more opportunity of hearing so that the case of the assessee could be disposed of on merits in the interest of justice and fairplay. Accordingly, we are setting aside the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) with the direction to decide the same on facts and as per law after affording the reasonable opportunity to the assessee. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH F, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2237/M/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/s. Vishwanath DCIT Circle- 2, Ramchandra Panvelkar, 2nd Floor, 45, Ramsmruti, Mohan Plaza Suryodaya Co-op. Khadkapada, Vs. Housing Society, Wayle Nagar, Shivaji Road, Kalyan (West), Ambernath (West), Thane Maharashtra Thane- 400 601 PAN: AAWPP9190L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by Shri Subodh Ratnaparkhi, A.R. Revenue by : Shri Rajeev Gubgotra, D.R. Date of Hearing : 27.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement 03.09.2019 ORDER Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: present appeal has been preferred by assessee against order dated 23.11.2017 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2014-15. 2. At outset, we notice that appeal is delayed by 22 days. Ld. A.R. explained before Bench reasons attributable to delayed filing of appeal by referring to affidavit filed explaining delay. ld Dr strongly objected condoning delay. 2 ITA No.2237/M/2018 M/s. Vishwanath Ramchandra Panvelkar 3. After hearing both parties on issue of delay, we observe that there is reasonable cause for delayed filing of appeal by 22 days. Accordingly, we are inclined to condone same and appeal is adjudicated in following paras. 4. issue raised in 1st ground of appeal is against order of Ld. CIT(A) being ex-parte order dismissing appeal of assessee when assessee failed to attend hearing before Ld. CIT(A) due to ill health which were beyond control of assessee. 5. After hearing both parties and perusing material on record, we observe that in this case Ld. CIT(A) has passed ex-parte order without considering merits of case when assessee/authorised representative failed to appear on various opportunities granted by Ld. CIT(A) as stated in para 1.1 of appellate order. Considering facts of case and arguments of rival parties, we are of opinion that assessee needs to be given one more opportunity of hearing so that case of assessee could be disposed of on merits in interest of justice and fairplay. Accordingly, we are setting aside issue to file of Ld. CIT(A) with direction to decide same on facts and as per law after affording reasonable opportunity to assessee. 6. In result, appeal of assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in open court on 03.09.2019. Sd/- Sd/- (Mahavir Singh) (Rajesh Kumar) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER 3 ITA No.2237/M/2018 M/s. Vishwanath Ramchandra Panvelkar Mumbai, Dated: 03.09.2019. Kishore, Sr. P.S. Copy to: Appellant Respondent CIT, Concerned, Mumbai CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai DR Concerned Bench By Order Dy Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai. Vishwanath Ramchandra Panvelkar v. DCIT, Circle- 2, Thane
Report Error