Shyam Sunder Jindal v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-30, New Delhi
[Citation -2019-LL-0903-117]

Citation 2019-LL-0903-117
Appellant Name Shyam Sunder Jindal
Respondent Name Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-30, New Delhi
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 03/09/2019
Assessment Year 2007-08
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: Revenue by : Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 03.09.2019 ORDER Per Bench: The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders o f the ld. We , therefore , considering the totality of the fact s as discussed hereinabove , set aside the impugned order and restore the matter back to the file of the Assessing Officer to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard and by confronting the assessee with the document s which relates to him. As regards to the legal issue relating to the validity of the assessment u/s 153A of the Ac t , it is noticed that the assessee in para 2.20 of his written submission s dated 22.08.2016 stated that the search team had confronted the assessee with unauthentic document. In the present case , it i s not clear as to whether any au then ti c document was confronted to the assessee or not. So in the absence of clear fact s on record , this issue is al so set aside to the file of the Assessing Officer to be adjudicated a fresh , in accordance with law after providing a due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Since, the verbatim o f the order , in the present case is also same, and in the absence of any change in the material facts, we hereby remand the matter back to the file o f the Assessing Officer to adjudicate a fresh, in accordance with law after providing opportunity o f being heard to the assessee. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES G , NEW DELHI Before Sh. Amit Shukla, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 5449/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 ITA No. 4125/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2008-09 ITA No. 4126/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 ITA No. 4127/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 ITA No. 4128/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Shyam Sunder Jindal, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of 12A, Green Avenue, Sector-D, Income Tax, Central Circle-30, Pocket-3, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi New Delhi-110070 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAGPJ0184N Assessee by : Sh. Rohit Jain, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR Date of Hearing: 28.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 03.09.2019 ORDER Per Bench: present appeals have been filed by assessee against orders o f ld . C IT(A)-30, New Delhi dated 24.08.2016 and 16.06.2016. 2. Heard arguments o f both parties and perused material available on record . 3. We find that similar matter in assessees own case for assessment year 2006-07 in ITA No. 5448/Del/2016 stands adjudicated by Co-ordinate Bench of ITAT Delhi wherein it was held that Assessing Officer informed assessee about copy of bank account obtained under DTA . However , contradictory observation has been made in para 6 of assessment order that requisite information from Swiss Banking Authority had not been received . We , therefore , considering totality of fact s as discussed hereinabove , set aside impugned order and restore matter back to file of Assessing Officer to be adjudicated afresh in accordance with law after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard and by confronting assessee with document s which relates to him . As regards to legal issue relating to validity of assessment u/s 153A of Ac t , it is noticed that assessee in para 2 .20 of his written submission s dated 22 .08 .2016 stated that search team had confronted assessee with unauthentic document . In present case , it i s not clear as to whether any au then ti c document was confronted to assessee or not . Assessing Officer also mentioned that reference was made on 27 .11 .2012 but it is not clear for which purpose said reference was made . So in absence of clear fact s on record , this issue is al so set aside to file of Assessing Officer to be adjudicated fresh , in accordance with law after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to assessee. Since, verbatim o f order , in present case is also same, and in absence of any change in material facts, we hereby remand matter back to file o f Assessing Officer to adjudicate fresh, in accordance with law after providing opportunity o f being heard to assessee. 4. In result, appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
(Order Pronounced in Open Cour t on 03/09/2019).Sd/- Sd/- (Amit Shukla) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 03/09/2019 Copy forwarded to:
1.Appellant
2.Respondent
3.CIT
4.CIT(Appeals)
5.DR: ITAT
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Shyam Sunder Jindal v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-30, New Delhi
Report Error