The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Thane v. Vaishali Vinayak Developers
[Citation -2019-LL-0827-68]

Citation 2019-LL-0827-68
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Thane
Respondent Name Vaishali Vinayak Developers
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 27/08/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 92 OF 2006 (Sr.No.54) Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Thane .. Appellant Vs M/s.Vaishali Vinayak Developers .. Respondent Along with INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 379 OF 2006 (Sr.No.55) Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Pune Appellant Vs Mr.Shankar Sah.Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Respondent with INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2007 (Sr.No.56) Commissioner of Income Tax-V, Pune .. Appellant Vs Sai Service Station Ltd. .. Respondent with INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 807 OF 2017 (Sr.No.66) Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai .. Appellant Vs M/s.India Bulls Wholesale Services Ltd., Formerly known as Pyramid Retails Ltd. Now known as M/s.Store One Retail India Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Sham Walve a/w Preetish Chatterjee, for Appellant. 2 54 -56, 66 -ITXA 92-06 379-06 49-07 & 807-17.doc CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, JJ. Date : 27 August, 2019. P.C. : learned counsel appearing for Appellant on instructions seeks to withdraw these Appeals. This for reason that tax effect involved in present Appeal is less than threshold limit provided under Central Board for Direct Taxes Circular No.17/2019 dated 8 August 2019. 2. Accordingly Appeals disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Refund of Court fees as per rules. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Thane v. Vaishali Vinayak Developer
Report Error