Leo Edibles & Fats Limited v. ACIT, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad
[Citation -2019-LL-0826-122]

Citation 2019-LL-0826-122
Appellant Name Leo Edibles & Fats Limited
Respondent Name ACIT, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad
Court ITAT-Hyderabad
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 26/08/2019
Assessment Year 2016-17
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags interest income earned • outstanding demand • business income • disputed amount • other sources • stay petition • charging of interest • stay of recovery
Bot Summary: Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the demand has arisen due to computation of the interest income earned by the assessee from deposits with the banks as income under the head income from other sources rather than the business income offered by the assessee. He submitted that the total tax demand along with interest is Rs. 25,38,267/- out of which, the assessee has already paid an amount of Rs. 19,89,497/-. Since the major portion of the taxes along with the interest has been paid, Learned Counsel for the Assessee sought for stay from recovery of outstanding demand of tax till the appeal is decided. Ld. DR on other hand objected for granting of stay. Having regard to the rival submissions and on perusal of the record, we find that the assessee has an arguable case and has already paid a substantial amount of outstanding demand i.e., Rs. 19,89,497/- which is more than 20 of the disputed amount of taxes. We are of the considered view that the assessee is deserved for grant of stay from recovery of outstanding demand of tax for a period of 180 or till the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier. In the result, Stay Application filed by the assessee is allowed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B , HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER S.A. Nos.195/Hyd/2019 (Arising out of ITA No. 1225/Hyd/2019) Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/s. Leo Edibles & Fats Vs. ACIT, Limited, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: AAACL 4123 E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri A.V. Raghuram Revenue by: Sri Nilanjan Dey, DR Date of hearing: 16.08.2019 Date of pronouncement: 26.08.2019 ORDER PER Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, J.M.: This Stay Application is filed by assessee seeking stay of collection of outstanding demand of tax of Rs. 5,49,770/-. 2. Learned Counsel for Assessee submitted that demand has arisen due to computation of interest income earned by assessee from deposits with banks as income under head income from other sources rather than business income offered by assessee. He submitted that total tax demand along with interest is Rs. 25,38,267/- (Tax 2 demand Rs: 23,49,423 + Rs. 1,88,844/-) out of which, assessee has already paid amount of Rs. 19,89,497/- (Rs. 18,51,045 + Rs. 1,38,452). Since major portion of taxes along with interest has been paid, Learned Counsel for Assessee sought for stay from recovery of outstanding demand of tax till appeal is decided. Ld. DR on other hand objected for granting of stay. 3. Having regard to rival submissions and on perusal of record, we find that assessee has arguable case and has already paid substantial amount of outstanding demand i.e., Rs. 19,89,497/- which is more than 20% of disputed amount of taxes. appeal is fixed for hearing on 23/12/2019. Therefore, we are of considered view that assessee is deserved for grant of stay from recovery of outstanding demand of tax for period of 180 or till disposal of appeal, whichever is earlier. 4. In result, Stay Application filed by assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in open court on 26 th August, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN) (P. MADHAVI DEVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Hyderabad, Dated: 26 th August, 2019. 3 OKK Copy to:- 1) M/s. Leo Edibles & Fats Limited, Flat No.203, Diamond Huose, Panjagutta, Khairatabad, Hydeabad. 2) ACIT, Circle-16(1), IT.Towers, A.C. Gudards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad. 3) CIT (A)-4, Hyderabad. 4) Pr. CIT-4, Hyderabad. 5) DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 6) Guard File Leo Edibles & Fats Limited v. ACIT, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad
Report Error