Commissioner of Income-tax, TDS-1, Mumbai v. Hathway Cable and Datacom Limited - 2019-LL-0805-41

Citation	2019-LL-0805-41
Appellant Name	Commissioner of Income-tax, TDS-1, Mumbai
Respondent Name	Hathway Cable and Datacom Limited
Court	HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	05/08/2019
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	tax effect
Bot Summary:	This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been filed challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal, states that he has been instructed to withdraw this appeal. This is for the reason that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than the threshold limit of Rs. 50 Lacs as provided in CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018. In view of the above submission, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

32. os itxa 595-17.doc R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary) IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 595 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax, TDS-1, Mumbai Appellant Vs M/s. Hathway Cable and Datacom Limited Respondent Mr. P.C. Chhotaray for Appellant Mr. Damodar i/by Kanga & Co for Respondent CORAM : AKIL KURESHI & S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 5, 2019. P.C.: 1. This Appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act for short) has been filed challenging order passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2. learned counsel appearing in support of appeal, states that he has been instructed to withdraw this appeal. This is for reason that tax effect involved in this appeal is less than threshold limit of Rs. 50 Lacs as provided in CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018. 3. In view of above submission, appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Refund of court fees as per rules. [ S.J. KATHAWALLA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ] 1 of 1 ::: Uploaded on - 07/08/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 08/08/2019 12:22:45 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax, TDS-1, Mumbai v. Hathway Cable and Datacom Limited

Metadata

Judgment