Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-6 v. Dhara Vegetable Oil And Foods Company Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0724-39]

Citation 2019-LL-0724-39
Appellant Name Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-6
Respondent Name Dhara Vegetable Oil And Foods Company Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 24/07/2019
Assessment Year 2003-04
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags scientific research • reassessment order • expenses incurred
Bot Summary: The Revenue is in appeal against an order dated 11th October 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.2875/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2003-04. There are two questions sought to be urged by the Revenue. One is whether the ITAT was justified in quashing the reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 147 of the Act admitting grounds of appeal of the Assessee under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules even though no appeal or cross objections have been filed by the Assessee itself against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax CIT(A) ITA 454/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. As far as the above plea is concerned this Court finds that the point stands answered against the Revenue by the decision of the Gujarat High Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vadodara-2 v. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.( 2018) 408 ITR 517 holding that although an Assessee may not have appealed or filed a cross-objection, in a different proceedings before the Appellate Forum / Tribunal, he is free to defend such order on all grounds including on any of the grounds decided against him by the authority whose order is otherwise in his favour. The second issue urged is whether the ITAT was justified in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance or deductions claimed by the Assessee under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Act 5. The brief facts as far as this issue is concerned are that according to the Revenue the actual research expenses have been incurred by the Mother Dairy Fruits and Vegetables Ltd. whose subsidiary is the present Assessee. The Assessee apparently reimbursed the expenses incurred on scientific research for Mother Dairy Fruits and Vegetables Ltd. The Assessee has been assessed in Gujarat prior to the AY in question and for an earlier AY 2002- 03 where again in reassessment proceedings such expenses were sought to be disallowed, the High Court of Gujarat decided the issue in favour of the Assessee by its order dated 10th July 2012 in Special Civil Application No. 9826 of 2009.


IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA 454/2019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 Appellant Through: Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate. versus M/S DHARA VEGETABLE OIL AND FOODS COMPANY LTD. Respondent Through: Ms.Shashi M.Kapila with Mr.R.R.Maurya, Mr.Pravesh Sharma, Mr.Sushil Kumar, Mr.Siddhrth Kapila and Ms.Malvika Kalra, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ORDER 24.07.2019 1. Revenue is in appeal against order dated 11th October 2018 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No.2875/Del/2013 for Assessment Year (AY) 2003-04. 2. There are two questions sought to be urged by Revenue. One is whether ITAT was justified in quashing reassessment order passed by Assessing Officer ( AO ) under Section 147 of Act admitting grounds of appeal of Assessee under Rule 27 of ITAT Rules even though no appeal or cross objections have been filed by Assessee itself against order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]? ITA 454/2019 Page 1 of 3 3. As far as above plea is concerned this Court finds that point stands answered against Revenue by decision of Gujarat High Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Vadodara-2 v. Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd.( 2018) 408 ITR 517 (Gujarat) holding that although Assessee may not have appealed or filed cross-objection, in different proceedings before Appellate Forum / Tribunal, he is free to defend such order on all grounds including on any of grounds decided against him by authority whose order is otherwise in his favour. Consequently, this Court is not persuaded to frame any question on this issue. 4. second issue urged is whether ITAT was justified in deleting addition made on account of disallowance or deductions claimed by Assessee under Section 35(1)(ii) of Act? 5. brief facts as far as this issue is concerned are that according to Revenue actual research expenses have been incurred by Mother Dairy Fruits and Vegetables Ltd. whose subsidiary is present Assessee. Assessee apparently reimbursed expenses incurred on scientific research for Mother Dairy Fruits and Vegetables Ltd. Assessee has been assessed in Gujarat prior to AY in question and for earlier AY 2002- 03 where again in reassessment proceedings such expenses were sought to be disallowed, High Court of Gujarat decided issue in favour of Assessee by its order dated 10th July 2012 in Special Civil Application No. 9826 of 2009 (Dhara Vegetable Oil and Foods Co. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax). ITA 454/2019 Page 2 of 3 6. said decision appears to have been accepted by Revenue. In that view of matter this Court is not inclined to frame any question on this issue as well. 7. appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. TALWANT SINGH, J. JULY 24, 2019 tr ITA 454/2019 Page 3 of 3 Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-6 v. Dhara Vegetable Oil And Foods Company Ltd
Report Error