Venkatesh E (HUF) v. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax-1, Bangalore / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) - III, Bangalore / Income-tax Officer, Ward-3(2)(4), Bangalore
[Citation -2019-LL-0718-46]
Citation | 2019-LL-0718-46 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Venkatesh E (HUF) |
Respondent Name | Chief Commissioner of Income-tax-1, Bangalore / Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) - III, Bangalore / Income-tax Officer, Ward-3(2)(4), Bangalore |
Court | HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 18/07/2019 |
Assessment Year | 2018-19 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | alternative remedy • recovery proceeding |
Bot Summary: | The grievance of the petitioner is that the appeal filed by him before the Appellate Authority has not been disposed of in accordance with law. The petitioner/assessee aggrieved by the assessments concluded by respondent No.3 relating to the assessment year 2015-16 has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority respondent No.2. Respondent No.3 has initiated the recovery proceedings. The petitioner has -3- approached respondent No.2 Appellate Authority for early hearing, but the same has not been responded to. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the ends of justice would be sub-served in directing respondent No.2 Appellate Authority to adjudicate upon the appeal and decide the same in accordance with law in an expedite manner, in any event, not later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. |