Pr. commissioner of Income-tax-9, Mumbai v. E City Project Construction Pvt. Ltd
[Citation -2019-LL-0125-18]

Citation 2019-LL-0125-18
Appellant Name Pr. commissioner of Income-tax-9, Mumbai
Respondent Name E City Project Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 25/01/2019
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect • condonation of delay
Bot Summary: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition has to be dismissed because the tax effect which is the subject matter of this petition is less than the limit prescribed in the Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 as amended by Circular dated 20th August, 2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2019.01.28 15:41:39 IST Reason: 1 In the light of the Circulars, the petition fails and is therefore dismissed. Question of law, if any, involved in the petition is kept open. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.


ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.7 SECTION IX SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8576/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-07-2017 in ITA No. 1082/2016 passed by High Court of Judicature at Bombay) PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9 MUMBAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S E CITY PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.37151/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date : 25-01-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s) Mr. H.Raghavendra Rao,Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Grover,Adv. For Mrs. Anil Katiyar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kaustubh Mishra,Adv. Mr. Abhishek Anand,Adv. Mr. M. P. Devanath, AOR UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Delay condoned. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this petition has to be dismissed because tax effect which is subject matter of this petition is less than limit prescribed in Circular No.3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 as amended by Circular dated 20th August, 2018 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ANITA MALHOTRA Date: 2019.01.28 15:41:39 IST Reason: 1 In light of Circulars, petition fails and is therefore dismissed. However, question of law, if any, involved in petition is kept open. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANITA MALHOTRA) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER 2 Pr. commissioner of Income-tax-9, Mumbai v. E City Project Construction Pvt. Ltd
Report Error