Commissioner of Income-tax-­16 v. Jamshed E. Bapasola
[Citation -2018-LL-1213-79]

Citation 2018-LL-1213-79
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax-­16
Respondent Name Jamshed E. Bapasola
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 13/12/2018
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags tax effect
Bot Summary: Mr.Jitendra Singh for the Respondent in ITXA No.2481 of 2013. Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA No.1057 of 2015. Both the Appeals under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Mr.A.R.Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This for ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 30/06/2020 12:57:08 ::: Priya Soparkar 2 44 itxa 2481 13 and 45 itxa 1057 15 o the reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11 th July, 2018. Accordingly, both the Appeals are dismissed as not pressed.


Priya Soparkar 1 44 itxa 2481 13 and 45 itxa 1057 15 o IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2481 OF 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax 16 Appellant V/s. Shri Jamshed E. Bapasola Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1057 OF 2015 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax 19 Appellant V/s. Ms.Prema G. Sanghvi Respondent Mr.A.R.Malhotra for Appellants. Mr.Jitendra Singh for Respondent in ITXA No.2481 of 2013. Mr.Atul Jasani for Respondent in ITXA No.1057 of 2015. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 13, 2018. P.C.: 1. Both Appeals under Section 260 of Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge orders passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). 2. Mr.A.R.Malhotra, learned Counsel appearing for Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This for ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 30/06/2020 12:57:08 ::: Priya Soparkar 2 44 itxa 2481 13 and 45 itxa 1057 15 o reason that tax effect in each of these appeals is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11 th July, 2018. 3. Accordingly, both Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 4. Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) Commissioner of Income-tax-16 v. Jamshed E. Bapasola
Report Error