Verma Roadways v. Commissioner of Income-tax Kanpur and Anr
[Citation -2018-LL-0312-19]

Citation 2018-LL-0312-19
Appellant Name Verma Roadways
Respondent Name Commissioner of Income-tax Kanpur and Anr.
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 12/03/2018
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags search and seizure • non-recording of finding
Bot Summary: For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER Signature Not Verified While we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Date: 2018.03.13 order to the effect that there was no infirmity in the search and 16:18:34 IST Reason: seizure of the petitioner, since it is pointed out that on other questions before the High Court there is no discussion, we permit 2 the petitioner to move the High Court. If such an application is moved within a period of two weeks from today, the High Court may consider the said application on merits and record its finding on the questions on which no finding is recorded. It will also be open to the petitioner to point out any other error except the validity of the search and seizure. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order that may be passed by the High Court, it will be at liberty to take its remedies. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.


SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 5920/2018 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-01-2018 in ITA No. 4/2000 passed by High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) M/S VERMA ROADWAYS Petitioner(s) VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KANPUR AND ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31170/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.32392/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) WITH SLP (C)NO. 6065/2018 (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.32536/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and I.A.No.33202/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. AND I.A. NO. 33200/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) Date : 12-03-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Kavin Gulati S.R., Adv. Mr. Pawanshree Agrawal, AOR Mr. Dinesh Prakash, Adv. Mr. Rohit S., Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Signature Not Verified While we do not find any ground to interfere with impugned Digitally signed by MAHABIR SINGH Date: 2018.03.13 order to effect that there was no infirmity in search and 16:18:34 IST Reason: seizure of petitioner, since it is pointed out that on other questions before High Court there is no discussion, we permit 2 petitioner to move High Court. If such application is moved within period of two weeks from today, High Court may consider said application on merits and record its finding on questions on which no finding is recorded. It will also be open to petitioner to point out any other error except validity of search and seizure. If petitioner is aggrieved by order that may be passed by High Court, it will be at liberty to take its remedies. special leave petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (SUSHIL KUMAR RAKHEJA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER Verma Roadways v. Commissioner of Income-tax Kanpur and Anr
Report Error