$ R-5A. * IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 315/2005 JAYA AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Through Nemo. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER % 15.11.2017 Despite second call, none appears for appellant. Counsel for respondent-Revenue has stated that he has contacted counsel for appellant, who had filed present appeal and was informed that appellant is no longer in touch with him. Counsel for respondent-Revenue has also drawn our attention to judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Sudhir Kumar Sharma (HUF) versus Commissioner of Income- Tax-III, Ludhiana, ITA No. 122/2014, decided on 12th May, 2014 and submits that ratio of this judgment would squarely apply. He submits that SLP against said decision was dismissed. appeal is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. SANJIV KHANNA, J. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. NOVEMBER 15, 2017 VKR Jaya Aggarwal v. Income-tax Officer