The Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)-1 v. Eservglobal SA
[Citation -2017-LL-0927-1]

Citation 2017-LL-0927-1
Appellant Name The Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)-1
Respondent Name Eservglobal SA.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 27/09/2017
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags question of law • royalty income
Bot Summary: For the reasons explained in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The Revenue is in appeal against an order dated 19th January, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.557/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2006- 07. The question urged by the Revenue concerns the deletion by the ITAT of the addition made by the Assessing Officer of the revenue received by the Assessee from Nortel India Pvt. Ltd. for the supply of software. The question whether the said payment can be termed as payment of royalty is no longer res integra. In Director of Income Tax v. Infrasoft Ltd. 264 CTR 329 and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M.Tech India Ltd. 381 ITR 31 this Court has held that the aforementioned payment for supply of software cannot be brought to tax as royalty. No substantial question of law arises from the impugned order of the ITAT. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.


$ 3 * IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 773/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1 Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Advocates. Versus ESERVGLOBAL SA. Respondent Through: Mr.Nageswar Rao, Advocate with Mr.Sandeep S.Karhail, Mr.Purushottam Anand, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER % 27.09.2017 C.M.No.32599/2017 (delay in filing) 1. For reasons explained in application, delay in filing appeal is condoned. application is disposed of. ITA No.773/2017 2. Revenue is in appeal against order dated 19th January, 2017 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA No.557/Del/2013 for Assessment Year (AY) 2006- 07. 3. question urged by Revenue concerns deletion by ITAT of addition made by Assessing Officer of revenue received by Assessee from Nortel India Pvt. Ltd. for supply of software. 4. question whether said payment can be termed as payment of royalty is no longer res integra. In Director of Income Tax v. Infrasoft Ltd. (2014) 264 CTR 329 (Del) and Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. M.Tech India (P) Ltd. (2016) 381 ITR 31 (Del) this Court has held that aforementioned payment for supply of software cannot be brought to tax as royalty. 5. No substantial question of law arises from impugned order of ITAT. appeal is accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 anb Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)-1 v. Eservglobal SA
Report Error