Jasdeep Singh Bains v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Patiala and others
[Citation -2017-LL-0911-3]

Citation 2017-LL-0911-3
Appellant Name Jasdeep Singh Bains
Respondent Name Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Patiala and others
Court HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 11/09/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags alternative remedy
Bot Summary: AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. The prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents vide which the recovery is being effected from the petitioner in view of the assessment orders dated 28.03.2004 and 11.12.2007 respectively, passed by respondent No.2, whereas he has left the company after one year and therefore, he is not liable to pay any amount. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail any other alternative remedy as may be available to him, in accordance with law. It shall be open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law.


IN HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 Civil Writ Petition No.20440 of 2017 Date of Decision: 11.09.2017 Jasdeep Singh Bains ...Petitioner versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present: Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for petitioner. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of Constitution of India is for issuance of writ in nature of mandamus/certiorari for quashing action of respondents vide which recovery is being effected from petitioner in view of assessment orders dated 28.03.2004 and 11.12.2007 (Annexures P-4 & P-6) respectively, passed by respondent No.2, whereas he has left company after one year and therefore, he is not liable to pay any amount. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw present writ petition with liberty to petitioner to avail any other alternative remedy as may be available to him, in accordance with law. 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 13-09-2017 11:10:18 ::: Civil Writ Petition No.20440 of 2017 -2- -------- 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to petitioner to take recourse to remedies as may be available to him, in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE (AMIT RAWAL) September 11, 2017 JUDGE sonia gugnani Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 13-09-2017 11:10:19 ::: Jasdeep Singh Bains v. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Patiala and other
Report Error