Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-5, New Delhi v. Kama Holdings Ltd
[Citation -2017-LL-0908-1]

Citation 2017-LL-0908-1
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-5, New Delhi
Respondent Name Kama Holdings Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 08/09/2017
Assessment Year 2008-09
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags question of law
Bot Summary: This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Revenue against the order dated 27th March 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 2993/Del/2014 for the Assessment Year 2008-09. The question urged by the Revenue in the present appeal also arose in ITA No. 818/2016 filed by the Revenue against the order dated 11th May 2016 passed by the ITAT in ITA No. 1555/Del/2014 for AY 2009- 10. The said ITA No. 818/2016 has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 16th August 2017. The Court was of the view that no substantial ITA 726/2017 Page 1 of 2 question of law arose for consideration. For the reasons as stated in the said order dated 16th August 2017, the present appeal is also dismissed as, in the considered view of the Court, no substantial question of law arises in the present appeal as well.


$ 4 * IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No. 726/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5, NEW DELHI Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel. versus KAMA HOLDINGS LTD. Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER % 08.09.2017 1. This is appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act ) by Revenue against order dated 27th March 2017 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No. 2993/Del/2014 for Assessment Year ( AY ) 2008-09. 2. question urged by Revenue in present appeal also arose in ITA No. 818/2016 filed by Revenue against order dated 11th May 2016 passed by ITAT in ITA No. 1555/Del/2014 for AY 2009- 10. 3. said ITA No. 818/2016 has been dismissed by this Court vide order dated 16th August 2017. Court was of view that no substantial ITA 726/2017 Page 1 of 2 question of law arose for consideration. 4. For reasons as stated in said order dated 16th August 2017, present appeal is also dismissed as, in considered view of Court, no substantial question of law arises in present appeal as well. S. MURALIDHAR, J. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. SEPTEMBER 08, 2017 dk ITA 726/2017 Page 2 of 2 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-5, New Delhi v. Kama Holdings Ltd
Report Error