Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6, New Delhi v. NTPC Electric Supply Company Ltd
[Citation -2017-LL-0822-6]

Citation 2017-LL-0822-6
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6, New Delhi
Respondent Name NTPC Electric Supply Company Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 22/08/2017
Assessment Year 2009-10
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags memorandum of understanding • interest earned • interest income • legal infirmity • question of law • interest on deposit • advance money received
Bot Summary: This is an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Revenue directed against the order dated 11th January 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.240/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The question of law urged by the Revenue is whether the ITAT erred in law in holding that taxability of interest income of 19,87,59,407/- will depend upon subsequent use of the interest income 3. The undisputed fact, as noted by the ITAT, is that the said interest income was earned by the Assessee on the deposit of advances received from REC Ltd. for Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojana. A ITA 511/2017 Page 1 of 2 Memorandum of Understanding was signed on 16th August 2004 between REC and the Assessee whereby inter alia it was agreed that interest earned on the deposits would be used as part of the cost of the projects and no other purpose. In the circumstances, the view taken by the CIT and affirmed by the ITAT, does not suffer from legal infirmity so as to give rise to any substantial question of law.


IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA No. 511/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel. versus NTPC ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ved Jain, Mrs. Rano Jain and Mr. Pranjal Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER % 22.08.2017 1. This is appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act ) by Revenue directed against order dated 11th January 2017 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No.240/Del/2013 for Assessment Year ( AY ) 2009-10. 2. question of law urged by Revenue is whether ITAT erred in law in holding that taxability of interest income of 19,87,59,407/- will depend upon subsequent use of interest income? 3. undisputed fact, as noted by ITAT, is that said interest income was earned by Assessee on deposit of advances received from REC Ltd. for Rajiv Gandhi Gramin Vidyutikaran Yojana ( RGGVY ). ITA 511/2017 Page 1 of 2 Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU ) was signed on 16th August 2004 between REC and Assessee whereby inter alia it was agreed that interest earned on deposits would be used as part of cost of projects and no other purpose. 4. In circumstances, view taken by CIT (A) and affirmed by ITAT, does not suffer from legal infirmity so as to give rise to any substantial question of law. 5. appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. AUGUST 22, 2017 dk ITA 511/2017 Page 2 of 2 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6, New Delhi v. NTPC Electric Supply Company Ltd
Report Error