Dilip Kumar & Associates v. The Union of India, Patna (Bihar) / The Income-tax Officer, Ward NO. 2(5), Bihar
[Citation -2017-LL-0808-10]

Citation 2017-LL-0808-10
Appellant Name Dilip Kumar & Associates
Respondent Name The Union of India, Patna (Bihar) / The Income-tax Officer, Ward NO. 2(5), Bihar
Court HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 08/08/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags rectification application • demand notice
Bot Summary: CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-08-2017 Challenging the act of the respondents in rejecting the return of the petitioner and directing him to pay dues as per the demand notice issued, the petitioner has filed this writ petition directly under Article 226 of the Constitution. A counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents and primary objection is that against the action impugned, the petitioner has remedy of filing rectification application under Section 154(1) of the Income Tax Act and thereafter to take recourse to statutory remedy of appeal, as may be available, under the Act, in case rectification application is not acceded to. Accordingly, contending that statutory Patna High Court CWJC No.12984 of 2015 dt.08-08-2017 2/2 remedy is available, the writ petition directly before this Court is not maintainable. We find much force in the submission of learned counsel for the respondents and we dispose of the matter granting liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the provisions of rectification available under Section 154 of the Act and thereafter if any grievance still subsists to take recourse to the statutory remedy of appeal under the Act for filing of the appeal. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12984 of 2015 M/s Dilip Kumar & Associates (Accounts & Tax Consultants) PAN-AAA BD 0811 (Proprietor/Member- Dilip Kumar) At- Bhadauni, Nawada- Gaya Road, North- Sobh Mandir, Nawada, P.O.+P.S.+Dist.- Nawada Pin Code- 805110 (Bihar). Petitioner/s Versus 1. Union of India through Principal Chief Commissioner of Income-Tax-1, C.R. Building, Virchand Patel Marge, Patna (Bihar). 2. Income-Tax Officer, Ward No. 2 (5), Biharsharif Hospital More, Biharsharif Nalanda (Bihar), Pin Code- 803101. Respondent/s Appearance : For Petitioner/s : None For Respondent/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi, Adv. CORAM: HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 08-08-2017 Challenging act of respondents in rejecting return of petitioner and directing him to pay dues as per demand notice issued, petitioner has filed this writ petition directly under Article 226 of Constitution. counter affidavit has been filed by respondents and primary objection is that against action impugned, petitioner has remedy of filing rectification application under Section 154(1) (b) of Income Tax Act and thereafter to take recourse to statutory remedy of appeal, as may be available, under Act, in case rectification application is not acceded to. Accordingly, contending that statutory Patna High Court CWJC No.12984 of 2015 dt.08-08-2017 2/2 remedy is available, writ petition directly before this Court is not maintainable. We find much force in submission of learned counsel for respondents and we dispose of matter granting liberty to petitioner to take recourse to provisions of rectification available under Section 154 (1) (b) of Act and thereafter if any grievance still subsists to take recourse to statutory remedy of appeal under Act for filing of appeal. With aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Sunil/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 10.08.2017 Transmission Date Dilip Kumar & Associates v. Union of India, Patna (Bihar) / Income-tax Officer, Ward NO. 2(5), Bihar
Report Error