Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai v. Vijayashanthi
[Citation -2017-LL-0804-12]

Citation 2017-LL-0804-12
Appellant Name Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai
Respondent Name Vijayashanthi
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 04/08/2017
Judgment View Judgment


ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.11 SECTION II-C SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9727/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-03-2011 in CRLOP No. 27158/2007 passed by High Court Of Madras At Chennai) ASSTT.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,CHENNAI Petitioner(s) VERSUS SMT. VIJAYASHANTHI Respondent(s) (FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 27034/2012) Date : 04-08-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Radhakrishnan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Deepak Prakash,Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair,Adv. Mr. Raneev Dhaiya,Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Leave granted. appeal is disposed of in terms of signed order. (MADHU BALA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2017.08.29 16:27:29 IST Reason: IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1341 OF 2017 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.9727 OF 2012) ASSTT.COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,CHENNAI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SMT. VIJAYASHANTHI ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for parties. By consent of parties, impugned order is set aside and matter is remanded to High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. Parties are directed to appear before High Court for further proceedings on 18th September, 2017. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] NEW DELHI J. 4th August, 2017 [S.ABDUL NAZEER] Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Chennai v. Vijayashanthi
Report Error