Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Lucknow v. K.N. Singh Patel
[Citation -2017-LL-0719-11]

Citation 2017-LL-0719-11
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Lucknow
Respondent Name K.N. Singh Patel
Court HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 19/07/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags block period • imposition of penalty • survey proceeding • search proceedings • retrospective applicability
Bot Summary: This is an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arising from the judgment and order dated 18.12.2015 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, in ITA No.571/LKW/2014. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified under the facts and circumstances of the case in dismissing the department's appeal and confirming the order of CIT; without appreciating that provision of Sec. 271AAA are not applicable to all the years of block period rather it is applicable to the 'specified previous year' only. 2)Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in dismissing the department's appeal without appreciating that the word 'specified previous year' used in Sec. 3) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified under the facts and circumstances of the case in dismissing the department's appeal by observing that no penalty U/s 271(1)(c) can be levied in non-search years of block period, in case where provisions of Sec.271AAA are applicable on the date of search. Section 271-AAA, a bare reading, shows that it is applicable in respect of the specified previous year which is certain since it has to 2 be found in the context of date of search/survey. Appeal is allowed in the manner, as aforesaid, and remanded to Tribunal for consequential follow.


Court No. - 3 Case :- INCOME TAX APPEAL No. - 47 of 2016 Appellant :- Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Lucknow Respondent :- Shri K.N. Singh Patel Counsel for Appellant :- Manish Misra Counsel for Respondent :- Ashish Bansal,Shashank Dhaon,Sidharth Dhaon,Surendra Kumar Garg Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Sheo Kumar Singh-I,J. 1. Heard Mr. Manish Mishra, learned counsel for appellant, and Mr. Siddhartha Dhaon, learned counsel for respondent. 2. This is appeal under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 arising from judgment and order dated 18.12.2015 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow, in ITA No.571/LKW/2014. 3. appeal was admitted on following substantial questions of law:- "1) Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified under facts and circumstances of case in dismissing department's appeal and confirming order of CIT (A); without appreciating that provision of Sec. 271AAA are not applicable to all years of block period rather it is applicable to 'specified previous year' only. 2)Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in dismissing department's appeal without appreciating that word 'specified previous year' used in Sec. 271AAA does not cover all assessment years under search. 3) Whether Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is justified under facts and circumstances of case in dismissing department's appeal by observing that no penalty U/s 271(1)(c) can be levied in non-search years of block period, in case where provisions of Sec.271AAA are applicable on date of search." 4. Section 271-AAA, bare reading, shows that it is applicable in respect of "specified previous year" which is certain since it has to 2 be found in context of date of search/survey. In respect of other matter, Legislature has enacted and inserted Explanation 5-A in Section 271 (1)(c) by Finance Act, 2009 with effect from 01.06.2007. 5. We find that Tribunal has not examined matter in light of effect of Section 271(1)(c) Explanation 5-A which has been introduced with retrospective effect i.e. 01.06.2007 and is applicable in respect to search/survey conducted on or after 01.06.2007. In present case, survey was conducted on 19.11.2008. Hence, it is within period provided under Explanation 5-A. 6. In view of above, question nos. 1 and 2 are answered in favour of Revenue but question no.3 left unanswered since we are remanding matter to Tribunal to examine effect of Section 271 (1) (c) Explanation 5-A and thereafter decide matter. 7. Appeal is allowed in manner, as aforesaid, and remanded to Tribunal for consequential follow. Order Date :- 19.7.2017 A. Katiyar Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax (Central), Lucknow v. K.N. Singh Patel
Report Error