High Energy Batteries (India) Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle II (2), Chennai
[Citation -2017-LL-0717-18]

Citation 2017-LL-0717-18
Appellant Name High Energy Batteries (India) Ltd.
Respondent Name The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle II (2), Chennai
Court HIGH COURT OF MADRAS
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 17/07/2017
Assessment Year 1996-97
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags reassessment proceedings
Bot Summary: 31200 of 2004 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in HX/1001/1996- 97, dated 20.10.2004 as amended by the order in HX/1001/1996-97, dated 21.10.2004. 31201 of 2004 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondent from making a reassessment in respect of the Assessment year 1996-97 pursuant to the Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in PAN.HX 1001/96-97 dated 07.03.2003. The petitioner in these Writ Petitions, seeks two reliefs, viz. I) To quash the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1996-97, dated 20.10.2004 and ii) To forbear the respondent from proceeding with reassessment proceedings in the said order. When the Writ Petitions were admitted on 28.10.2004, interim order was granted, stating that the assessment proceedings, which were kept in abeyance may go on the assessment shall not be given effect to, until further orders passed by the Court, and the said interim order was made absolute on 14.03.2009. In 3 obedience to the direction issued by the Court, has stated that the order passed by him will not given effect to, until further orders. In the light of the subsequent development, and the Assessing Officer, having held vide his order, dated 04.11.2004, that on examination of facts, no sustainable additions could be made to the income of the assessee and the loss determined as per the order, dated 10.01.2003, giving effect to the ITAT's Order is restored, and the tax thereon is Nil, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, with a direction to the Assessing Officer to give effect to his order, dated 04.11.2004.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 17.07.2017 CORAM Hon'ble Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam W.P.Nos.31200 & 31201 of 2004 High Energy Batteries (India) Ltd., Esvin House, Perungudi, Chennai-600 096 Rep.by its Executive Director S.Sridharan. .. Petitioner in both W.Ps Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income -Tax, Company Circle II (2), Chennai-34. ...Respondent in both W.Ps. Prayer in W.P.No.31200 of 2004 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for records in HX/1001/1996- 97, dated 20.10.2004 as amended by order in HX/1001/1996-97, dated 21.10.2004. Prayer in W.P.No.31201 of 2004 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing Respondent from making reassessment in respect of Assessment year 1996-97 pursuant to Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act in PAN.HX 1001/96-97 dated 07.03.2003. For Petitioner : M/s.Susmaharini http://www.judis.nic.in 2 For Respondent : M/s.Hema Murali Krishnan Senior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER Heard M/s. Susmaharini, learned counsel appearing for petitioner and M/s.Hema Murali Krishnan, learned Senior Standing Counsel for respondent. 2. petitioner in these Writ Petitions, seeks two reliefs, viz., i) To quash notice issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 1996-97, dated 20.10.2004 and ii) To forbear respondent from proceeding with reassessment proceedings in said order. 3. When Writ Petitions were admitted on 28.10.2004, interim order was granted, stating that assessment proceedings, which were kept in abeyance may go on, however, assessment shall not be given effect to, until further orders passed by Court, and said interim order was made absolute on 14.03.2009. During pendency of Writ Petitions, assessment has been completed, and order, dated 04.11.2004, has been passed by Assessing Officer, which is favourable to assessee, however, in penultimate para of order, Assessing Officer, in http://www.judis.nic.in 3 obedience to direction issued by Court, has stated that order passed by him will not given effect to, until further orders. 4. In light of subsequent development, and Assessing Officer, having held vide his order, dated 04.11.2004, that on examination of facts, no sustainable additions could be made to income of assessee and loss determined as per order, dated 10.01.2003, giving effect to ITAT's Order is restored, and tax thereon is Nil, these Writ Petitions are disposed of, with direction to Assessing Officer to give effect to his order, dated 04.11.2004. No costs. 17.07.2017 Index : Yes/No sd/klt To Deputy Commissioner of Income -Tax, Company Circle II(2), Chennai-34. T.S.Sivagnanam. J., sd/klt http://www.judis.nic.in 4 W.P.Nos.31200 & 31201 of 2004 17.07.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in High Energy Batteries (India) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Company Circle II (2), Chennai
Report Error