Sabir Dass v. The Assistant Commissioner Income-tax (TDS) and Ors
[Citation -2017-LL-0705-19]

Citation 2017-LL-0705-19
Appellant Name Sabir Dass
Respondent Name The Assistant Commissioner Income-tax (TDS) and Ors.
Court HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 05/07/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags compensation • tds • grant of refund
Bot Summary: Whether approved for reporting1 of For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. Sanjay Karol, ACJ. Despite opportunity, no response has been filed on behalf of the respondents. At this stage, learned counsel representing the petitioner invites our attention to the order dated 3.12.2014, passed by this Court in identical matters, wherein a direction was issued to the Income Tax H Department, to refund the amount deducted by it at source from compensation paid to the petitioners in lieu of acquisition of their land by the SJVNL. 2. Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, did not dispute the aforesaid submission having been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and accordingly, this Court deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ::: Downloaded on - 21/08/2017 10:23:37 :::HCHP 2 No. 1 and 2 to refund a sum of Rs. 19,636/- deducted as TDS at. P source from compensation paid in RFA No. 272 of 2001 titled as SJVNL and Ors. Qua acquisition of land H belonging to the petitioner. Petition rt stands disposed of, so also pending applications, if any.


IN HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 1045 of 2017 Date of Decision: 05.07.2017 Sabir Dass ..Petitioner. . Versus .P Assistant Commissioner Income Tax (TDS) and Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Hon ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. Hon ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 of For Petitioner: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For Respondents: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ms. Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral) Despite opportunity, no response has been filed on behalf of respondents. At this stage, learned counsel representing petitioner invites our attention to order dated 3.12.2014 (Annexure P-3), passed by this Court in identical matters, wherein direction was issued to Income Tax H Department, to refund amount deducted by it at source from compensation paid to petitioners in lieu of acquisition of their land by SJVNL. 2. Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, did not dispute aforesaid submission having been made by learned counsel for petitioner and accordingly, this Court deems it fit to dispose of present petition with direction to respondents 1 Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see judgment? ::: Downloaded on - 21/08/2017 10:23:37 :::HCHP 2 No. 1 and 2 to refund sum of Rs. 19,636/- deducted as TDS at . .P source from compensation paid in RFA No. 272 of 2001 titled as SJVNL and Ors. v. Sabir Dass and Ors. , qua acquisition of land H belonging to petitioner. Needless to say, this Court hopes and trusts that needful shall be positively done by authority of concerned within period of four weeks from today. 3. Petition rt stands disposed of, so also pending applications, if any. ou ( Sanjay Karol), C Acting Chief Justice 5th July, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), h Manjit/Shankar Judge. ig H ::: Downloaded on - 21/08/2017 10:23:37 :::HCHP Sabir Dass v. Assistant Commissioner Income-tax (TDS) and Or
Report Error