IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 3 ITA 363/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF LNCOME TAX (CENTRAL) 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S PEPSI FOODS PVT. LTD., ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Amit Shrivastava and Mr. Anmol Anand, Advs. With 4 ITA 364/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) -1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S PEPSI FOODS PVT. LTD., ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Amit Shrivastava and Mr. Anmol Anand, Advs. 5 + ITA 365/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S PEPSI FOODS PVT. LTD., ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Amit Shrivastava and Mr. Anmol Anand, Advs. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDER 03.07.2017 CM APPL. No. 17093/2017 in ITA 363/2017 CM APPL. No. 17094/2017 in ITA 365/2017 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. These applications accordingly stand allowed. ITA Nos. 363/2017, 364/2017, 365/2017 3. question of law raised by Revenue in these appeals, concerning power of Tribunal to extend interim order of stay beyond 365 days in deserving cases, stands covered against it by decision dated 19th May 2015 of this Court in W.P. (C) No. 1334 of 2015 [Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax]. 4. appeals are accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J JULY 03, 2017/dk Principal Commissioner of Income-tax (Central)-1 v. Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd