Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Nagpur v. Nagpur District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd
[Citation -2017-LL-0701-2]

Citation 2017-LL-0701-2
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Nagpur
Respondent Name Nagpur District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd.
Court HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 01/07/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags bad and doubtful debts • co-operative bank
Bot Summary: This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenges the order dated 23.06.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. This appeal was admitted on 16.07.2015 on the following substantial question of law:- Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that if the assessee's claim of bad or doubtful debt is rejected, even then, the income from banking business would be increased, which would be eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Act, ignoring the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 168 Taxman 224 and the fact that the total income of the assessee was Nil 3. From the record it is clear that the loss determined by the Assessing Officer for the subject assessment year in the case of respondent-assessee was Rs.19.84 crores. In revision, the Commissioner of Income Tax on examination of the issue added that the provision for bad and doubtful debts is Rs.2.10 crores, consequently reducing the loss from Rs.19.84 crores to Rs.17.74 crores. The Tribunal in its impugned order has taken a view that even after the amount of Rs.2.10 crores towards bad and doubtful debts is added back, on account of rejection of the same, yet the respondent- assessee would not be chargeable to any tax, as the Co-operative Bank is exempt under Section 80P of the Act. It is the case of the revenue that deduction under section 80P of the Act cannot be extended in case of an assessee whose total income as assessed is nil or loss. It is an admitted position between the parties that an identical issue was for consideration before the Apex Court in Synco Industries Ltd.vs. Assessing Officer, Income Tax Mumbai 168 Taxman 224 wherein it has been held that deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Act would not be available where the gross total income of the assessee is nil or loss.


IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR. Income Tax Appeal No.1 of 2010 (Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Nagpur .vs. Nagpur District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. Nagpur. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. N.S. Bhattad, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : M.S. Sanklecha & Manish Pitale, JJ. DATED : July 01, 2017. This appeal under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) challenges order dated 23.06.2009 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal). 2. This appeal was admitted on 16.07.2015 on following substantial question of law:- Whether in facts and circumstances of case, Tribunal was justified in holding that if assessee's claim of bad or doubtful debt is rejected, even then, income from banking business would be increased, which would be eligible for deduction under Section 80P of Act, ignoring decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2008) 168 Taxman 224 (SC) (Synco Industries Ltd. Versus Assessing Officer, Income Tax, Mumbai) and fact that total income of assessee was Nil ? 3. From record it is clear that loss determined by Assessing Officer for subject assessment year in case of respondent-assessee was Rs.19.84 crores. This was after having allowed ::: Uploaded on - 04/07/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 06/07/2017 09:13:33 ::: 2 ITL1 10.odt provision for bad and doubtful debts under Section 36(1)(vii) of Act to extent of Rs.2.10 crores. In revision, Commissioner of Income Tax on examination of issue added that provision for bad and doubtful debts is Rs.2.10 crores, consequently reducing loss from Rs.19.84 crores to Rs.17.74 crores. Tribunal in its impugned order has taken view that even after amount of Rs.2.10 crores towards bad and doubtful debts is added back, on account of rejection of same, yet respondent- assessee would not be chargeable to any tax, as Co-operative Bank is exempt under Section 80P of Act. It is, therefore, case of revenue that deduction under section 80P of Act cannot be extended in case of assessee whose total income as assessed is nil or loss. It is admitted position between parties that identical issue was for consideration before Apex Court in Synco Industries Ltd. .vs. Assessing Officer, Income Tax Mumbai (2008) 168 Taxman 224 (SC) wherein it has been held that deduction under Chapter VI-A of Act would not be available where gross total income of assessee is nil or loss. 4. In view of above agreed position, substantial question of law is answered in negative i.e. in favour of appellant-revenue and against respondent-assessee. 5. Appeal disposed of in above terms. JUDGE JUDGE halwai ::: Uploaded on - 04/07/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 06/07/2017 09:13:33 ::: Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Nagpur v. Nagpur District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd
Report Error