The Commissioner Of Income-tax-18, Mumbai v. P. L. Patel - 2017-LL-0621-44

Citation	2017-LL-0621-44
Appellant Name	The Commissioner Of Income-tax-18, Mumbai
Respondent Name	P. L. Patel
Court	HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Relevant Act	Income-tax
Date of Order	21/06/2017
Assessment Year	2001-02
Judgment	View Judgment
Keyword Tags	tax effect
Bot Summary:	Mr.Ashok J.Patil, for the Respondent. The present appeal pertains to the assessment year 2001 2002. In view of that the learned Counsel for the appellant states that the department has taken a policy decision not to prosecute the appeals below Rs.20 lakhs in view of the C.B.D.T. Circular dated 10 December 2015 and seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. Needless to state that the issue raised in the appeal, is kept open.

PVR 1/2 6itxa967-11.doc IN HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 967 OF 2011 Commissioner Of Income Tax 18 Mumbai ...Appellant Versus P. L. Patel ...Respondent Mr.A.R.Malhotra with Mr.N.A.Kazi, for Appellant. Mr.Ashok J.Patil, for Respondent. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ. DATED : 21st June, 2017 PER COURT : 1. present appeal pertains to assessment year 2001 2002. 2. tax effect is of Rs.16,19,484/ . In view of that learned Counsel for appellant states that department has taken policy decision not to prosecute appeals below Rs.20 lakhs in view of C.B.D.T. Circular dated 10 December 2015 and seeks leave to withdraw appeal. 3. appeal as such is disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees as per rules be refunded. ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 25/03/2020 12:39:55 ::: PVR 2/2 6itxa967-11.doc 4. Needless to state that issue raised in appeal, is kept open. (G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 23/06/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 25/03/2020 12:39:55 ::: Commissioner Of Income-tax-18, Mumbai v. P. L. Patel

Metadata

Judgment