Rajiv and Company v. Commissioner of Income-tax , Lucknow and another
[Citation -2017-LL-0511-66]
Citation | 2017-LL-0511-66 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | Rajiv and Company |
Respondent Name | Commissioner of Income-tax , Lucknow and another |
Court | HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 11/05/2017 |
Assessment Year | 2010-11 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | sundry creditor • credit-worthiness of creditor |
Bot Summary: | Learned counsel for appellant confined his challenge in respect to ground No.2 before Tribunal, i.e., addition of Rs. 2,17,03,387/ on account of sundry creditors made by Assessing Officer but Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow deleted aforesaid addition, which has been reversed by Tribunal restoring order of Assessing Authority. Assessing Officer required the names, addresses and copies of accounts of such sundry creditors which could not be supplied by Assessee 2 and, thereafter, Assessing Officer made addition of said amount but it was deleted by CIT A on the basis that opening balance of unpaid liability of material and labour, etc. It may be that the payments in the present year of Rs.1519.70 lacs has liquidated the entire amount of opening balance of Rs.217.03 lacs and the entire amount of closing balance of Rs.277.01 lacs is in respect of amount credited in the present year without disclosing the name of the creditors and their identity etc. Under these facts, in our considered opinion, the order of CIT(A) is not sustainable because Assessee has 3 not been able to establish the names, addresses and identity and creditworthiness of the creditors and therefore, we reverse the order of CIT(A) on this issue and restore that of the Assessing Officer. We are aware that there are certain judgments which say that creditors of goods or expenses cannot be added u/s 68 but in the present case, the Assessee has not established this also that the creditors are for goods or expenses and mere crediting the amounts in the account with the nomenclature Creditors for material and labour etc. As per copy available on pages 47 to 64 of the paper book does not establish the contention that there are creditors for goods and/ or expenses particularly in the absence of name and address of the said creditors. Once huge amount of Rs. 277.01 lacs and odd shown towards sundry creditors could not be verified by Assessee by producing relevant documents, Tribunal has rightly allowed addition thereof and its finding of fact which is not shown to be perverse or contrary to record, in our view, would not give rise to any substantial question of law. |