Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6, New Delhi v. Mentor Graphics (India) P. Limited
[Citation -2017-LL-0502-14]

Citation 2017-LL-0502-14
Appellant Name Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6, New Delhi
Respondent Name Mentor Graphics (India) P. Limited
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 02/05/2017
Assessment Year 2006-07
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags international transaction • transfer pricing officer • export turnover • question of law • telecommunication charges • determination of alp • arm length price
Bot Summary: There are two broad issues raised by the Revenue in this appeal. The grievance of the Revenue is that without a proper discussion and merely relying on past precedents, the ITAT has excluded the comparables chosen by the Transfer Pricing Officer after rejecting the 22 comparables included by the Assessee in its Transfer ITA 318/2017 Page 1 of 2 Pricing study. The Court has carefully perused the impugned order of the ITAT and the discussion on this aspect. In the considered view of this Court, while it is true that previous precedents have been relied upon by the ITAT, it would be incorrect to say that ITAT did not take into account the factors that weighed with it for excluding the said comparables. The Court does not find any substantial question of law arising on this aspect and therefore, declines to frame any question. The case of the Revenue is that ITAT erred in accepting the case of the Assessee that the communication charges should stand excluded both from the export turnover as well as the total turnover. No substantial question of law arises on this issue as well.


$ 10. * IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 318/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6, NEW DELHI Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel, with Mr.Vikrant A.Maheshwari, Advocate. Versus MENTOR GRAPHICS (INDIA) P. LIMITED Respondent Through: Mr.Himanshu Sinha, Advocate with Ms.Vrinda Tulshan, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER % 02.05.2017 1. This appeal by Revenue under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) is against order dated 21st September, 2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No.1565/HYD/2010 for Assessment Year (AY) 2006-07. 2. There are two broad issues raised by Revenue in this appeal. One concerns exclusion of certain comparables for purpose of calculation of arm s length price of international transaction involving Assessee during AY 2005-06. grievance of Revenue is that without proper discussion and merely relying on past precedents, ITAT has excluded comparables chosen by Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) after rejecting 22 comparables included by Assessee in its Transfer ITA 318/2017 Page 1 of 2 Pricing study. 3. Court has carefully perused impugned order of ITAT and discussion on this aspect. In considered view of this Court, while it is true that previous precedents have been relied upon by ITAT, it would be incorrect to say that ITAT did not take into account factors that weighed with it for excluding said comparables. Court does not find any substantial question of law arising on this aspect and therefore, declines to frame any question. 4. second issue concerns deduction under Section 10 of Act. case of Revenue is that ITAT erred in accepting case of Assessee that communication charges should stand excluded both from export turnover as well as total turnover. It is seen that this Court in CIT v. Genpact India 203 Taxman 632 has answered this very issue in favour of Assessee and against Revenue. Consequently, no substantial question of law arises on this issue as well. 5. appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J MAY 02, 2017 anb ITA 318/2017 Page 2 of 2 Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-6, New Delhi v. Mentor Graphics (India) P. Limited
Report Error