Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)–1 v. Aspect Software Inc
[Citation -2017-LL-0425-95]

Citation 2017-LL-0425-95
Appellant Name Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)–1
Respondent Name Aspect Software Inc.
Court HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 25/04/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags international transaction • double taxation
Bot Summary: This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Revenue against the impugned Order dated 27th June, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 1842/Del/2016 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. While admitting these appeals on 16th January, 2017, this Court passed the following order: ITA No. 7/2017 Page 1 of 3 Admit. The following questions of law arise for consideration: Did the ITAT fall into error in holding that the transaction in question, i.e., supply of customized software was not royalty under Article 12 of the Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement read with Section 9 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the circumstances of the case. Did the ITAT fall into error in its interpretation of Section 234 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the circumstances of the case. Apart from the order as noted above, the Court decided that these present appeal would be considered in light of the judgment to be rendered by the Court in a batch of appeals. The Court by its decision in The Commissioner of Income Tax International Transaction -2 v. ZTE Corporation 237 DLT 572 decided the questions that arose in the aforementioned batch of appeals in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. Accordingly, the questions framed are answered in the negative i.e. ITA No. 7/2017 Page 2 of 3 against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee.


IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 44 ITA 7/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) 1 Appellant Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior standing counsel. versus ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. Respondent Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra with Ms. Asiya, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR ORDER % 25.04.2017 CM APPL 715/2017 (delay) in ITA 7/2017 1. For reasons stated therein, these applications are allowed. delay of 14 days in re-filing appeals is condoned. ITA No. 7/2017 2. This appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 ( Act ) by Revenue against impugned Order dated 27th June, 2016 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in ITA No. 1842/Del/2016 for Assessment Year ( AY ) 2011-12. 3. While admitting these appeals on 16th January, 2017, this Court passed following order: ITA No. 7/2017 Page 1 of 3 Admit. following questions of law arise for consideration: (i) Did ITAT fall into error in holding that transaction in question, i.e., supply of customized software was not royalty under Article 12 (4) of Indo-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) read with Section 9 (1) (vii) of Income Tax Act, 1961, in circumstances of case. (ii) Did ITAT fall into error in its interpretation of Section 234 (B) of Income Tax Act, 1961, in circumstances of case. 4. Apart from order as noted above, Court decided that these present appeal would be considered in light of judgment to be rendered by Court in batch of appeals (The Commissioner of Income Tax International Transaction -2 v. ZTE Corporation ITA 904-909/2016). 5. Court by its decision in Commissioner of Income Tax International Transaction -2 v. ZTE Corporation 237 (2017) DLT 572 (DB) decided questions that arose in aforementioned batch of appeals (which also involve questions that arise in present appeal) in favour of Assessee and against Revenue. 6. Further by separate order passed today, this Court has answered identical questions urged by Revenue in ITA No. 909 of 2015 [Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation-1 v. Aspect Software Inc.] and batch concerning earlier AYs, against it and in favour of same Assessee. 7. Accordingly, questions framed are answered in negative i.e. ITA No. 7/2017 Page 2 of 3 against Revenue and in favour of Assessee. 8. appeal is dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J CHANDER SHEKHAR, J APRIL 25, 2017 Rm ITA No. 7/2017 Page 3 of 3 Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)1 v. Aspect Software Inc
Report Error