$ 35 to 39 * IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 1094/2008 C.I.T Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. St. Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate versus SIAL SBEC BIO ENERGY LTD Respondent Through + ITA 353/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. St. Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate versus SBEC BIOENERGY LTD Respondent Through + ITA 592/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. St. Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate versus SBEC BIOENERGY LTD Respondent Through + ITA 798/2015 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. St. Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate versus SBEC BIOENERGY LIMITED Respondent Through + ITA 800/2015 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Jr. St. Counsel with Mr. Vikrant A. Maheshwari, Advocate versus SBEC BIOENERGY LIMITED Respondent Through CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % 10.04.2017 1. By order dated 10th March 2016, i.e. more than year ago, since process fee was not filed, fresh notice was directed to be issued to Respondent, returnable on 17th August, 2016. 2. Till date, despite above opportunity, no process fee has been filed by Appellant. There is no reason why these appeals should be kept pending when plainly Appellant is itself not interested in pursuing them. 3. appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. S.MURALIDHAR, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J APRIL 10, 2017 acm CIT v. SIAL SBEC Bio Energy Ltd