The Commissioner of Income-tax v. Adhyaksh / Sachiv Raja Bhayia Youth Brigade Kunda Pratapgarh
[Citation -2017-LL-0410-51]
Citation | 2017-LL-0410-51 |
---|---|
Appellant Name | The Commissioner of Income-tax |
Respondent Name | Adhyaksh / Sachiv Raja Bhayia Youth Brigade Kunda Pratapgarh |
Court | HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD AT LUCKNOW |
Relevant Act | Income-tax |
Date of Order | 10/04/2017 |
Assessment Year | 1996-97, 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-00, 2000-01, 2001-02 |
Judgment | View Judgment |
Keyword Tags | computation of undisclosed income • block period |
Bot Summary: | Heard Sri Alok Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant. This appeal under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961 has arisen from the judgment and order dated 24.4.2009 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad in Income Tax Appeal No. 248/Alld. The appeal was admitted on following substantial questions of law: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that issuance of notices u/s 158BC and computation of undisclosed income in this case was without jurisdiction. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in taking the view that the Additional Director of Income Tax was not having jurisdiction or authority to issue warrant of authorization. Whether the order of the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is tenable in view of amendment made in Sections 132(1) and 132A(1) by Finance Act, 2009 with retrospective effect from 1.6.1994 to the effect that Additional Director or Additional Commissioner of Income tax may issue of authorization. Counsel for appellant at the outset stated that the issue involved in this appeal is squarely covered by decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dr. A.K. Bansal, 2013(4) ADJ 591. Having heard learned counsel for parties and perusal of record, in our view, this matter is squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment. |