Commnr. of Income-tax, Madurai v. M/s. Annamalaiar Mills
[Citation -2017-LL-0328-15]

Citation 2017-LL-0328-15
Appellant Name Commnr. of Income-tax, Madurai
Respondent Name M/s. Annamalaiar Mills
Court SUPREME COURT
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 28/03/2017
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags subsidiary company • holding company • capital gain
Bot Summary: Briefly stated, the facts of this case are as follows: M/s Annamalaiar Mills Ltd., respondent herein is a holding company of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd. Hundred per cent shares of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd. were held by the respondent company. In the respondent company, there were two groups of shareholders; the majority shareholder called Group A was having 61.26 per cent shares whereas the minority shareholders called Group B were holding 38.74 per cent shares. An agreement was entered into between the two groups on 24.06.1985 by which Group A came to hold all the shares in the holding company i.e. the respondent herein and Group Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2017.04.01 B was given 100 per cent shares in the subsidiary company 12:45:04 IST Reason: i.e. M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd. However, M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd also paid a sum of Rs.42.45 2 lakhs to the respondent company. Proceedings under the Gift Tax Act were initiated in respect of payment of Rs.42.45 lakhs received by the respondent company. The assessing officer treated the amount of Rs.42.45 lakhs paid by the M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd. to the respondent company as capital gain on the footing that since both the companies are now 100 per cent owned by Group A or Group B, as the case may be, payment of Rs.42.45 lakhs was to off set valuation of the shares of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd. The Assessing Officer opined that the respondent herein-assessee was liable to pay tax for capital gains which was upheld in the appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, in appeal preferred by the respondent herein accepted the pleas put forth by the respondent herein, set aside the assessment and restored the matter to the Income Tax Officer so that the assessee may approach the Central Board of Direct Taxes. 3 The sole question which arises for our consideration is as to whether the sum of Rs.42.45 lakhs paid by M/s Annamalaiar Textiles Ltd. to the respondent company is liable to any capital gains or not.


1 IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1864/2007 COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S. ANNAMALAIAR MILLS Respondent(s) ORDER We have heard learned counsel for parties and perused impugned order dated 20.01.2004 passed by Division Bench of High Court of Judicature at Madras in T.C. No.55 of 2001. Briefly stated, facts of this case are as follows: M/s Annamalaiar Mills (P) Ltd., respondent herein is holding company of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. Hundred per cent shares of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. were held by respondent company. In respondent company, there were two groups of shareholders; majority shareholder called Group was having 61.26 per cent shares whereas minority shareholders called Group B were holding 38.74 per cent shares. agreement was entered into between two groups on 24.06.1985 by which Group came to hold all shares in holding company i.e. respondent herein and Group Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by ASHA SUNDRIYAL Date: 2017.04.01 B was given 100 per cent shares in subsidiary company 12:45:04 IST Reason: i.e. M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. However, M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd also paid sum of Rs.42.45 2 lakhs to respondent company . Proceedings under Gift Tax Act were initiated in respect of payment of Rs.42.45 lakhs received by respondent company. However, we are not concerned with question of levy of gift tax under present proceedings. assessing officer treated amount of Rs.42.45 lakhs paid by M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. to respondent company as capital gain on footing that since both companies are now 100 per cent owned by Group or Group B, as case may be, payment of Rs.42.45 lakhs was to off set valuation of shares of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. Assessing Officer opined that respondent herein-assessee was liable to pay tax for capital gains which was upheld in appeal before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). However, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras, in appeal preferred by respondent herein accepted pleas put forth by respondent herein, set aside assessment and restored matter to Income Tax Officer so that assessee may approach Central Board of Direct Taxes. Income Tax Officer was further directed to finalise assessment in accordance with directions that may be given by Central Board of Direct Taxes. matter was taken up before High Court of Madras and order of Tribunal was upheld by Madras High Court. 3 sole question which arises for our consideration is as to whether sum of Rs.42.45 lakhs paid by M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. to respondent company is liable to any capital gains or not. It is not in dispute that M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd. did not pay any amount to shareholders who ultimately got shares transferred in their names. respondent was holding 100 per cent shares of M/s Annamalaiar Textiles (P) Ltd., before it was transferred to Group B. No payment was made to shareholders belonging to Group B and, therefore, question of there being any capital gains at hands of respondent herein does not arise. Needless to mention that transaction of payment of Rs.42.45 lakhs had been subjected under Gift Tax Act and Department cannot claim both under Gift Tax Act and also levy tax under Income Tax Act. In view of above discussion, we do not find any merit in Civil Appeal and same is dismissed. J. [R.K. AGRAWAL] J. [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR] NEW DELHI; MARCH 28, 2017. 4 ITEM NO.113 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIIA SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No.1864/2007 COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, MADURAI Appellant(s) VERSUS M/S. ANNAMALAIAR MILLS Respondent(s) Date : 28/03/2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Appellant(s) Mr. P.S. Patwalia, ASG Mr. Arijit Prasad, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajat Singh, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mrs. Shashi M. Kapila, Adv. Mr. Prashant Singh, Adv. Mr. Tanvir Nayar, Adv. Mr. Pravesh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shivang Dubey, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta,Adv. UPON hearing counsel Court made following ORDER Civil Appeal is dismissed in terms of singed order. (ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (CHANDER BALA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on file) Commnr. of Income-tax, Madurai v. M/s. Annamalaiar Mill
Report Error