M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari & Party (Ajmer Group) v. ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur
[Citation -2016-LL-1021-156]

Citation 2016-LL-1021-156
Appellant Name M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari & Party (Ajmer Group)
Respondent Name ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur
Court ITAT-Jaipur
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/10/2016
Assessment Year 2001-02
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags excise department • mistake apparent
Bot Summary: Petition has been filed against the order of the Tribunal in ITA No. 592/JP/2004 and ITA No. 767/JP/2004 dated 14.07.2015. In its petition, the assessee has submitted that no findings has been given on the following grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in its appeal: That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ld. IT(A)-II, Jaipur has erred in law in sustaining trading addition of Rs. 2,60,00,000/- against loss of Rs. 2,92,30,610/- suffered by the assesee mainly for the reason of high payment of high short licence to the Excise department MA No. 94/JP/2004 M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari vs. ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur 2. The assessee is accordingly submitted that the above mistake apparent from the record may please be rectified u/s 254(2) of the IT Act, 1961 2.1 The ld. DR has submitted that the appeal of the assesee against the impunged order of the Tribunal has since been dismissed by the Hon ble Rajasthan High Court and in light of that, the subject petition of the applicant should not be entertained. 2.2 As the appeal against the order of the Tribunal sought to be rectified has been dismissed by the Hon ble Rajasthan High Court, we do not see any merit in the present application.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR BEFORE: SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM MA No.94/JP/16 arising out of ITA No.592/JP/2004 ) Assessment Year : 2001-02 M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari cuke ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur & Party (Ajmer Group), C-82, Vs. Prithviraj Road, Jaipur PAN No. AAAAR 1100 P Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri G.M. Mehta (CA) Revenue by : Smt. Roshanta Meena (JCIT) Date of Hearing : 21.10.2016 Date of Pronouncement : 21/10/2016. ORDER PER SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This Misc. petition has been filed against order of Tribunal in ITA No. 592/JP/2004 and ITA No. 767/JP/2004 dated 14.07.2015. In its petition, assessee has submitted that no findings has been given on following grounds of appeal raised by assessee in its appeal: That on facts and in circumstances of case, ld. IT(A)-II, Jaipur has erred in law in sustaining trading addition of Rs. 2,60,00,000/- against loss of Rs. 2,92,30,610/- suffered by assesee mainly for reason of high payment of high short licence to Excise department MA No. 94/JP/2004 M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari vs. ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur 2. assessee is accordingly submitted that above mistake apparent from record may please be rectified u/s 254(2) of IT Act, 1961 2.1 ld. DR has submitted that appeal of assesee against impunged order of Tribunal has since been dismissed by Hon ble Rajasthan High Court and in light of that, subject petition of applicant should not be entertained. 2.2 As appeal against order of Tribunal sought to be rectified has been dismissed by Hon ble Rajasthan High Court, we do not see any merit in present application. Hence same is dismissed. With above directions, Misc. Application is disposed off accordingly. Order pronounced in open court on 21/10/2016. Sd/- Sd/- (KUL BHARAT) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) Judicial Member Accountant Member Jaipur Dated:- 21/ 10/2016 Pillai Copy of order forwarded to: s 1. Appellant- M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari & Party, Jaipur 2. Respondent- ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur 3. CIT II, Jaipur 4. CIT(A)-II, Jaipur 5. DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (MA No.94 /JP/2016) By order, Assistant. Registrar 2 MA No. 94/JP/2004 M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari vs. ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur 3 M/s Rajaram Rajendra Bhandari & Party (Ajmer Group) v. ACIT, Circle-5, Jaipur
Report Error