Wahabuddin v. ITO, Ward-2(4), Meerut
[Citation -2016-LL-1021-134]

Citation 2016-LL-1021-134
Appellant Name Wahabuddin
Respondent Name ITO, Ward-2(4), Meerut
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 21/10/2016
Assessment Year 2012-13
Judgment View Judgment
Bot Summary: PAN-ABEPW2480P Assessee by None Revenue by None Date of Hearing 26.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement 21.10.2016 ORDER The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 14.01.2016 of the CIT(A), Meerut pertaining to 2012-13 on various grounds. At the time of hearing, adjournments were moved by the assessee and the Revenue. No one was present on behalf of the assessee in support of the adjournment at the time of hearing. In view thereof, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine as in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing, it would be at liberty if so advised to pray for a recall of this order. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC-3 NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .No.-1644/Del/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2012-13) Wahabuddin, Vs ITO, C/o-VInod Kumar Goel, 282, Ward-2(4) Boundary Road, Civil Lines, Meerut Meerut. PAN-ABEPW2480P (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by None Revenue by None Date of Hearing 26.09.2016 Date of Pronouncement 21.10.2016 ORDER present appeal has been filed by assessee assailing correctness of order dated 14.01.2016 of CIT(A), Meerut pertaining to 2012-13 on various grounds. 2. However, at time of hearing, adjournments were moved by assessee and Revenue. No one was present on behalf of assessee in support of adjournment at time of hearing. appeal was passed over twice. Even in third round, position remained same and none was present. It is further seen that adjournment was moved by counsel whose Power of Attorney is not on record. It is further seen that defects pointed out by Registry on 11.04.2016 till date have not been cured. In view thereof, appeal of assessee is dismissed in limine as in peculiar facts and circumstances of present case, it can be safely presumed that assessee is not serious in pursuing present appeal. Support is drawn from order of Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P). 3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case assessee is able to show that there was reasonable cause for non-representation on date of hearing, it would be at liberty if so advised to pray for recall of this order. said order was pronounced on date of hearing itself in open Court. I.T.A .No.-1644/Del/2016 4. In result, appeal of assessee is dismissed. order is pronounced in open court on 21st of October, 2016. Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2 Wahabuddin v. ITO, Ward-2(4), Meerut
Report Error