Sajni Thukral v. ACIT, Central Circle-5, New Delhi
[Citation -2016-LL-1020-57]

Citation 2016-LL-1020-57
Appellant Name Sajni Thukral
Respondent Name ACIT, Central Circle-5, New Delhi
Court ITAT-Delhi
Relevant Act Income-tax
Date of Order 20/10/2016
Assessment Year 2005-06
Judgment View Judgment
Keyword Tags dismissing the appeal in limine
Bot Summary: New Delhi PAN-ACRPT8214E Assessee by None Revenue by Sh.F.R.Meena, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 29.08.2016 Date of Pronouncement 20.10.2016 ORDER All these appeals have been filed by the assessee assailing the correctness of the order dated 16.02.2015 of the CIT(A)-24, New Delhi pertaining to 2005- 06; 2006-07 2008-09 AYs on various grounds. No one was present on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing. Even in the third round, the position remained the same as neither the assessee is represented nor there is any adjournment on record. It is further seen that the notice sent to the assessee on 20.07.2016 at the address indicated in Column No.10, has also come back with the comment left. Accordingly, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly in the absence of any representation or petition seeking time, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeals of the assessee in limine. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed.


IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: SMC-1 NEW DELHI BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A .No.-3147 to 3148/Del/2015 & 3150/Del/2015 (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2005-06; 2006-07 & 2008-09) Sajni Thukral, Vs ACIT, G-8, Maharani Bagh, Central Circle-5, New Delhi-110064. New Delhi PAN-ACRPT8214E (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by None Revenue by Sh.F.R.Meena, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 29.08.2016 Date of Pronouncement 20.10.2016 ORDER All these appeals have been filed by assessee assailing correctness of order dated 16.02.2015 of CIT(A)-24, New Delhi pertaining to 2005- 06; 2006-07 & 2008-09 AYs on various grounds. 2. However, no one was present on behalf of assessee at time of hearing. appeals were passed over twice. Even in third round, position remained same as neither assessee is represented nor there is any adjournment on record. record shows that defect pointed out by Registry remains uncured. It is further seen that notice sent to assessee on 20.07.2016 at address indicated in Column No.10, has also come back with comment left . Accordingly, in peculiar facts and circumstances of present case, it can be safely presumed that assessee is not serious in pursuing present appeal. Accordingly in absence of any representation or petition seeking time, only alternative left is to dismiss appeals of assessee in limine. Support is drawn from order of Tribunals in Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P). 3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case assessee is able to show that there was reasonable cause for non-representation on date of hearing, it would be at liberty if so advised to pray for recall of this order. said order was pronounced on date of hearing itself in open Court. I.T.A .No.-3147 to 3148/Del/2015 & 3150/Del/2015 4. In result, appeals of assessee are dismissed. order is pronounced in open court on 20th of October, 2016. Sd/- (DIVA SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2 Sajni Thukral v. ACIT, Central Circle-5, New Delhi
Report Error